Quote:
Originally Posted by Wiki
Wat?
You really are a bit of a muppet, aren't you?
How does a facetious comment imply that someone thinks they 'run' a thread - whatever that means.
And if anyone seems to think I run the thread it would be you since you were whining at me because I didn't go on the offensive when Monty made a minor slip.
I've already, in effect, answered that question many times. It's not my fault if you're too thick to understand.
Looking at your posts today it seems as if you believe that you run the thread given the number of people you've taken to task because you don't like the way they've responded.
I have responded to people who replied to me. You like to have your say in everything. This thread appears to be called, 'the great poker is rigged debate, last post by Wiki.'
I suggested you think you run this thread, as you appear to make the rules, one set for people who share your views and one for people who don't.
You shoot down people, (those who don't share your views), on any irrelevancy you find, spelling, grammar, poker knowledge, knowledge of other subjects (17th century literature in one of my cases), any number of other irrelevancies which don't spring to mind right now.
You and people who agree with you are allowed to answer questions by trying to be humorous, yet anyone who doesn't share your views is accused of dodging the issue.
Not going to turn it further into a personal attack, nor bore people with another of our arguments, that's just my opinion. This thread is very difficult at times, as I say there are 10-15 of you who refuse to speak out against each other at any time, yet are happy to pick on people who are 'easier targets.'
As I've said before Wiki, I've been told you've had several accounts banned in the past, which would certainly suggest, you don't always conduct yourself in an appropriate manner and if people did their jobs properly, you wouldn't infact be here at all.