we were debating on if that test would be relevant or not and spade just went and did it anyways. After conseration, it is obvious that you cannot put any stock into it bc the data is biased toward weighting the pot.

?

AMEC is officially on my ignore list now. I honestly can't believe how much sincere help he got in this thread, from spade, myself, and many others, and the way he's conducting himself in the face of all of it.

The guy clearly knows less about statistics than most of us but yet wants to overstate the significance of the tests done and turn it into some kind of brag now? Well buddy not only are you an idiot, you have no class either. Just PM me when you win your prop bet. Until then, good riddance.

exactly what help have you or anyone other than spade contributed?

I've thanked spade numerous times for the time he spent. But he simply doesnt have what it takes to do a complete/full analysis to draw any kind of conclusion to.

We can do an analysis on how often I hit my draw on the turn. What if Im running in the bottom 5% in this analysis?

Then we can do one on card distrubuation in the BB. What if Im running in the bottom 5% in this?

you can on and on but at some point when the results keep coming back dirty, then what?

How many times before yuo say "wait a minute here, something is up".

The best thing to come out of this is your prop bet. You got your money in good, win or lose.

Next best thing is the numbers confirmed what you suspected, and I don't think you have to be "rainman" to have good intuition.

LOL

You're just having fun with him right? Because on both those points its pretty much the opposite. If you disagree I'm sure like pooflinger you can articulate how Spade's analysis shows that it was rigged.

This is the 2nd time you have done this. How can you make judgments on anyone's ability to analyze hand histories when you don't even understand the difference between "top 99%" and "top 1%".

HINT: 99% of poker players are in the top 99%.

lol morans

top99%aments

Well, have just bothered to download all the HH's now while I've been catching up on this thread and found it most enlightening.

Based on abuifegbwijhb0803927's attitude since Spade did his analysis I am inclined to not even bother with doing mine but I think I still will, if only to test some things for myself. I know I certainly won't be as nice as Spade was with what I release given that we have full permission to release any data from those hands we wish to.

I also am not going to be in a rush to get it out now, it will get done when I get around to it, but I will clear up one misconception you have....you didnt get any of this work done for free, you just are too clueless to realise you gave people that can be playing against you 300k hands of data on yourself without them even having to put in the hours sitting at a table with you.

stfu

******s still spewing nonsensical nonsense itt?

This message is hidden because AMEC0404 is on your ignore list.
This message is hidden because pooflinger is on your ignore list.


I feel so much better now, seriously. I tried to reasonably communicate with them long enough.

If this is all you have to say, maybe you should just retire from posting.

Wait. Don't you still have an open bet with this guy?

He might still find evidence of rigging, such as his interpretation of his all-in results. You should have let me buy you out of the bet.

Anyway, enjoy being married to this clown.

I believe I said you were not allowed to share the HHs with ANY third parties whatsoever under any circumstance. You share them with anyone and I sue you, end of story.

When he wins the bet he can PM me, I'll still pay up. He just can't be reasoned with any more.

I mean honestly after spadebidder's summary post he doesn't have a leg to stand on. It's funny how he claims we know nothing about statistics when he previously claimed that if he was within 5% on each bucket he'd shut up. Of course, being 5% off would've been so many standard deviations from the norm that really would be evidence of rigging. But of course he didn't know that. He's just living in his own little statistical world.

1. I never said I was going to share them with anyone, I merely pointed out that you have given at least 2 people 300k hands on how you play without knowing if we're actually regs in your games

2. But..but...but I live in one of those places that don't have any laws or regulations and aren't up to the high standards of US laws, how ever will you be able to sue me?

well im not worried about you or the other guy knowing how I play. just dont share them

But they don't "keep coming up dirty" do they. What is the point in continuing to speculate? You think it's rigged becuase you have seen something dirty - test for it - show results - win your bet.

Good luck with that.

so far we are 1 for 1 on a study coming up dirty