The great "Poker is rigged" debate - Collected threads edition - Page 497 - Internet Poker

Thers no way this is real, no way. seriously, its just not possible. I played omaha since i was as lil kid, you cannot get runner, runnerred in every single hand-m impossible. I understand 2+2 has a site to run and they all agree i suck and dont understand variance, but whatever. lol, i played 250k hands at stakes that are lol. This is gay no1s ever gonna read this thats a real person, but if so dont trust it. complete joke.

I dont give 1 single **** about any hand ive played and imwilling toshare all hand history you judge 4 urself. Keep in mind im a real person and all hands are real.

Quote

01-21-2010 , 02:30 AM

#12402

ClickClickShip

banned

Join Date: Jan 2010 Posts: 159

Quote:

Originally Posted by tonetone

Thers no way this is real, no way. seriously, its just not possible. I played omaha since i was as lil kid, you cannot get runner, runnerred in every single hand-m impossible. I understand 2+2 has a site to run and they all agree i suck and dont understand variance, but whatever. lol, i played 250k hands at stakes that are lol. This is gay no1s ever gonna read this thats a real person, but if so dont trust it. complete joke.

I dont give 1 single **** about any hand ive played and imwilling toshare all hand history you judge 4 urself. Keep in mind im a real person and all hands are real.

Check again.

Quote

01-21-2010 , 02:33 AM

#12403

Rek

HUZA 2008

Join Date: Aug 2007 Posts: 10,033

Runner runnerred at Omaha? impossible.

Quote

01-21-2010 , 02:44 AM

#12404

Cry Me A River

Orange is the new Green

Join Date: Jun 2004 Posts: 23,784

In before taunting!

Oh, never mind...

Quote

01-21-2010 , 02:46 AM

#12405

elgreenhornet

old hand

Join Date: Jul 2007 Posts: 1,773

sn?

Quote

01-21-2010 , 02:48 AM

#12406

hanuta81

journeyman

Join Date: Jan 2009 Posts: 239

you played 250k hands and did not win one showdown ?
lol, nice story

Quote

01-21-2010 , 03:11 AM

#12407

vlee89

adept

Join Date: Jan 2009 Posts: 848

Quote:

Originally Posted by edfurlong

I really doubt that

What does this say?

LOL owned op robot spammer

Quote

01-21-2010 , 03:13 AM

#12408

flight2q

old hand

Join Date: Jul 2005 Posts: 1,258

4317 ?
45171 ?

I'm really bad at these things.

Quote

01-21-2010 , 03:15 AM

#12409

iopq

veteran

Join Date: Oct 2005 Posts: 3,347

it's fixed? finally, mine was like broken forever

Quote

01-21-2010 , 03:18 AM

#12410

MicroBob

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Sep 2003 Posts: 61,575

Why did you play 250k hands if you didn't think the games were legitimate?

Also, please feel free to post all 250k of your hands. Was that really what you were offering to do?

Quote

01-21-2010 , 03:19 AM

#12411

ant___z

grinder

Join Date: Nov 2005 Posts: 677

Quote:

Originally Posted by tonetone

Thers no way this is real, no way. seriously, its just not possible. I played omaha since i was as lil kid, you cannot get runner, runnerred in every single hand-m impossible. I understand 2+2 has a site to run and they all agree i suck and dont understand variance, but whatever. lol, i played 250k hands at stakes that are lol. This is gay no1s ever gonna read this thats a real person, but if so dont trust it. complete joke.

I dont give 1 single **** about any hand ive played and imwilling toshare all hand history you judge 4 urself. Keep in mind im a real person and all hands are real.

This thread is a level, right?

Quote

01-21-2010 , 03:21 AM

#12412

FoxyShazam

centurion

Join Date: Nov 2009 Posts: 130

...and so concludes another episode of someone experiencing the negative side of statistical variance and was unable to cope. These are all tear-jerking stories imo.

Quote

01-21-2010 , 03:24 AM

#12413

themandude

veteran

Join Date: Mar 2006 Posts: 2,252

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rek

Runner runnerred at Omaha? umpossible.

Quote

01-21-2010 , 03:35 AM

#12414

MicroBob

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Sep 2003 Posts: 61,575

Quote:

Originally Posted by FoxyShazam

...and so concludes another episode of someone experiencing the negative side of statistical variance and was unable to cope. These are all tear-jerking stories imo.

foxy - sorry but you are likely incorrect. It is far more likely that this player is just bad and fails to realize it than it is a situation of him suffering the negative side of variance. Almost always is the case with those who believe the game to be fixed.

I know HE thinks that he's suffering more bad beats than he was due. But he probably isn't.

Quote

01-21-2010 , 05:31 AM

#12415

AMEC0404

banned

Join Date: Jan 2010 Posts: 875

I am a winningplayer and I have believed online poker to be rigged from day 1.

Quote

01-21-2010 , 09:50 AM

#12416

spadebidder

Actually Shows Proof

Join Date: Aug 2008 Posts: 7,905

Quote:

Originally Posted by AMEC0404

I am a winningplayer and I have believed online poker to be rigged from day 1.

coolstorybro

Quote

01-21-2010 , 01:27 PM

#12417

signuptoday

old hand

Join Date: Apr 2009 Posts: 1,283

Quote:

Originally Posted by MicroBob

this
i am also believe i suffer more beat and cooler.
the fact is, i am probly suffer way more beat and cooler then i believe..lol

Quote

01-22-2010 , 12:34 PM

#12418

TwoMoos

adept

Join Date: Oct 2008 Posts: 1,089

Even the poll on this thread is rigged. At least, it should have a category for "I don't know."

Quote

01-22-2010 , 12:56 PM

#12419

qpw

banned

Join Date: Jul 2007 Posts: 4,019

Quote:

Originally Posted by TwoMoos

Even the poll on this thread is rigged. At least, it should have a category for "I don't know."

That was pointed out when it first went up.

It should really have five options: Yes, no, probably, probably not and don't know.

I think most of us just used yes for probably and no for probably not.

I can't believe there are that many people who are stupid enough to be certain of something for which they do not have compelling evidence either way.

Quote

01-23-2010 , 12:52 PM

#12420

Markusgc

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Feb 2006 Posts: 8,788

Quote:

Originally Posted by qpw

It should really have SIX options: Yes, no, probably, probably not, don't know AND LOCK THIS STUPID THREAD UP.

fixeded.

Quote

01-23-2010 , 01:01 PM

#12421

smithcommajohn

grinder

Join Date: Sep 2009 Posts: 533

every time i get sucked out on, it's rigged... when i dish out the suckout, it's justice!

Quote

01-23-2010 , 01:38 PM

#12422

qpw

banned

Join Date: Jul 2007 Posts: 4,019

Quote:

Originally Posted by Markusgc

"It should really have SIX options: Yes, no, probably, probably not, don't know AND LOCK THIS STUPID THREAD UP."

fixeded.

But then we'd be back to having new rigged threads started every few days and nowhere to coral them.

Quote

01-23-2010 , 03:39 PM

#12423

tk1133

veteran

Join Date: Jan 2009 Posts: 2,221

"Isn't that PDS unsecure?

I.e. it's now easier to hack users and see their hole cards. In a classic environment I need to communicate their cards to my servers. In your environment I only need to hack their software with my own dll shuffler, i.e. network communication is not required and my hack is untracable to me!

I know this is not legal usecase but the usecases we are talking about PDS originally are such anyway."