The betting discussion involves twomoos. None of that was directed at you.

OK I was not clear.

Threre is some people who speak in code and secrets. Inside language i am not partial to.

THANK YOU

Yeah, I understand that. So forget the bet. I'll let you know how it works out.

There wouldn't of been any need if it wasn't for uigea.

Shrug whatever, fine , I'll do that bet, but again you cannot be in control of the data yourself. Also, we both transfer the bet amounts beforehand to someone like spadebidder or Bobo who is trustworthy. You send $100 , I send $50. Otherwise, pass because to be blunt, I don't trust you one bit, why should I, and a degen like you will just use this as a freeroll otherwise.

If you lose he sends me the $100, if I lose we do the bet again, and if I lose again we send you $100. If I win the second bet we both get our money back.

Josem will arrange to zip your hand histories (2000 of them) after a certain point of agreed time to send to you, myself and spade, and spade can do the math analysis of them and present the data.

Honestly, I don't think this is worth any of their time, it certainly is not worth mine, and it will not prove a thing about your beliefs of if it is rigged, but I am hoping they will help purely because this may be the best way to deal with a whiny degen like yourself who is willing to spew money in terms of EV.

Tell me if the above works and then we will see if others agree to it as well.

All the best.

Presumably you read about as frequently as you post.

Or you habituate a different forum.

OK, so that covers the hands where you lost. Did you count the times that you won?

Why?

You wouldn't understand if we explained it.

In words of one syllable.

Even with pictures.

Men who do not defend truth and rumor are suspect. What is your agenda and what is your gain.

I once was in a cardgame that had a dealer dealing dirty. It was told to me after. He had been delt with. But i was unaware of it at the time and would my voice of suspicions been treated unkindly i might have left that game sooner. Even though he was only working partners i think i had lost money to him.

THis is years ago and so it no longer bothers me. BUT


I will voice protest to what i find is highly suspect and strangle odd outcomes.


THANK YOU

Your right...I've been too busy reading the "Consumer Protection Act" that's gonna put your trolling out of business....

It's my right to do what, exactly?


Dream on.

Do you really think that, even if the vague possibility of that bill ever being passed is fulfilled, it will stop 'tards such as yourself whining about sites being rigged.


BTW, FYP.

There wouldnt be any need for UIGEA if these Poker Sites weren't trying to hide anything when they were called upon.....

So they got accused of aiding Terrorism, money laundering and organized crime....

Wait till you see what sites will have to do to be granted a license....

That's inside info tho

You're still welcome.

You're correct.

But yes, I'm positive it will be passed, it was going to be passed from the beginning of all this UIGEA....

Yes it will stop rigtards...all I can say I guess....

Wrong.

No they didn't.

At least not by anyone of any importance.

And as such something that is certainly not available to you.

Good so far.

The Only trouble is that that means that:

Is wrong.

Still, 33% is better than your normal score.



BTW:
You have to wonder why the US bothers with a president, house of representatives and senate when all they need to do is ask tk1133.

Or maybe, I asked the man, that shook the hand of the man of one of the 3 that you mentioned...

I only mentioned one man.

When are you going to learn basic English?

So a Senator, HoR and the President are all one man?

When are you going to start playing Poker?

Apparently you missed the post where I accepted, but simply stated that we'd have to have an escrow and a credible way to obtain and analyze the data.

EDIT: Reading further Monteroy basically did the exact same thing, although we're both in agreement that it wouldn't prove anything.

I hope your political insider has more knowledge then last time you made a prediction.


There might be less but there will always be people who think pokers rigged.

QPW everytime I come back to read this thread your posts in particular make me angry... You honestly sound like you have some real-life insecurity/psychological problems so you come on here to vent and try and improve your ego
Now go ahead and call me a rigtard and try and be funny to impress kingoffelt and monteroy.. but your agenda is already pretty obvious here in this thread

Hey R4R, what do you think of spadebidder's study results so far?

I have only read the action flop section so far. But like I said before, his findings are irrelevant to me..

I never denied the fact the statistics would be on point.. It has nothing to do with my theory of "timing".. In this theory, action flops DO exist.. but at specific times based on a users account history/past actions..