Quote:
Originally Posted by BucketFoot
Are we supposed to believe sites are legit because they passed a planned audit 5 years ago?
You specifically will never believe they are legit no matter how, when and how often they are audited.
However, you are not representative of the overall market, more the fringe paranoid losing player section.
If the majority of players had real concerns in this regard the sites would not exist since they would never be comfortable.
Quote:
Originally Posted by BucketFoot
That's like saying Barry Bonds passed a drug test 5 years ago. He must be clean.
He has never failed a drug test, yet is considered one of the biggest cheaters ever.
There is a load of common sense and fairly significant circumstantial data that shows what reality is in his case. The dude grew a hat size and gained significant power at the age of 40.
If you want to compare this then you need to bring evidence even powerful circumstantial evidence to show the RnG is rigged. All it consists of so far are selective memories, bad beat whines and conspiracy theories that usually would make the sites less money.
Show me the equivalent of a 40 yeal old guy growing a hat size and I will get interested. Saying you lost AA to QQ does not count since that should happen at times.
Quote:
Originally Posted by BucketFoot
Sites passing a single drug test doesn't prove anything other than for those couple hours
they were dealing hands that passed some type of test.
It does nothing to show how the sites are operating hundreds of updates later.
This paranoid ramble explains why guys like you will NEVER be satisfied no matter how much testing is done. That is why the site's should essentially politely ignore you guys, as you do not matter much.
They do need to ensure the comfort of their more relatively sane player base and they do that by putting in measures to prevent fraud, collusion, bots etc while also making it easier to do withdrawals and deposits.
You know - the common sense business stuff that actually matters in this industry.
Quote:
Originally Posted by BucketFoot
Until sites are given random audits at least a few times a year, many will remain skeptical.
That would not change your perception a single bit. You would just say they knew when they were coming, they were prepared for when they were coming etc etc.
They probably already are subject to these but I'm sure if that is the case you won't believe or care.
You are a riggedologist, nothing more.
All the best.