And yet despite Josem's continued effort to provide real data on the issue and refute the rigtard views that are based on..... imaginary data.... it will still go in one ear and out the other
NFuego, what is your purpose here? You sound alot like Markusgc, any relation there?
Quote:
I think that the endorsement by the UK Minister on the issue is very strong evidence of their credibility.
I have seen no evidence of their consistent regulation. They have provided no such thing. Therefore, how can I believe they are credible? The UK Minister is irrelevant.
Quote:
Originally posted by DMOOGLE
That governments and other regulatory establishments are useless? Is that your point?
Obviously not, my man. It's very hard to make a point on this forum as you have to thoroughly explain things before people like you can understand them.
So why is it that some people seem to never be targeted by these evil sites? GOLDENACCOUNTS?
You're thinking very broad, thats the problem with people now.. I look at what's in front of me.
When it comes down to it - it doesn't matter how much Dwan or Robl made from online poker, that does not prove to me that it is legit.
The reality is that you are trusting something you have no clue about. It may be rigged, it may not be rigged - there is no way to be sure. If you make money from online poker, then obviously i'd reccommend you keep playing until you start seeing your luck running out. I personally had a very bad experience with online poker as poker tracker confirmed (as well as my results). From comparing my results with others who were in the same situation and seeing common patterns that a 5 year old child could recognize I used my common sense and concluded something was not right. Maybe your experience is different than mine - if that is true, I wish you the best.
I have seen no evidence of their consistent regulation. They have provided no such thing. Therefore, how can I believe they are credible? The UK Minister is irrelevant.
You're surely not refusing to believe something because there is a lack of evidence to support your false belief, are you?
You're thinking very broad, thats the problem with people now.. I look at what's in front of me.
When it comes down to it - it doesn't matter how much Dwan or Robl made from online poker, that does not prove to me that it is legit.
So people winning on multiple sites as well as live isn't proof of anything? If the sites have "programs" that choose when to doomswitch people, then how could people have similar results on different sites? I fail to see how this is thinking too broadly about it.
Quote:
If you make money from online poker, then obviously i'd reccommend you keep playing until you start seeing your luck running out. I personally had a very bad experience with online poker as poker tracker confirmed (as well as my results).
About when did this happen? Couldn't have been a couple years ago when the games got harder, could it?
I have seen no evidence of their consistent regulation. They have provided no such thing. Therefore, how can I believe they are credible? The UK Minister is irrelevant.
Well, you should know about being an irrelevance.
Quote:
It's very hard to make a point on this forum as you have to thoroughly explain things before people like you can understand them.
Yes.
When you habitually talk nonsense people do find it hard to understand.
I have seen no evidence of their consistent regulation. They have provided no such thing. Therefore, how can I believe they are credible? The UK Minister is irrelevant.
I just wanted to highlight the awesomeness of this comment.
You refuse to believe that the regulation is credible because of a lack of evidence, yet you are happy to believe that online poker is rigged, despite a lack of evidence.
That is hilarious! I was going to quote my favourite line, but then I realised the entire thing is gold! I think we should all chipin and get a copy for R4R!
That is hilarious! I was going to quote my favourite line, but then I realised the entire thing is gold! I think we should all chipin and get a copy for R4R!
Four years ago the same guy (Robert Eagle) was selling "Party Poker Cracked". Now it's "Poker Stars Cracked". Same scam, same book, just edit the site name. Same guy has been selling ebooks and other junk on ebay for years. He also sells both books in a self-published paperback edition.
Four years ago the same guy (Robert Eagle) was selling "Party Poker Cracked". Now it's "Poker Stars Cracked". Same scam, same book, just edit the site name. Same guy has been selling ebooks and other junk on ebay for years. He also sells both books in a self-published paperback edition.
Beyond and including charts, graphs, and strategies, Party Poker "CRAKED" reveals how to take advantage of online poker shuffling algorithms. This 100% legal system is your ticket to winning succesfully online. The strategies work on 16 other major online poker casinos.
And this version is only $47.50 instead of $67 for the Pokerstars one. That's like a savings of 85%! Gosh, that money will be made back in like a day and half of grinding once we've cracked the algorithm!
Mark you can't promise ****. If the game is rigged then his results will not improve - if the game is not rigged his results will improve. WHICH IS IT?
Obv I know your opinion. But you people need to stop dancing around here acting like you can guarantee online poker is not rigged - PROVE IT.
So if Donko reads and participates in the appropriate 2+2 Forums and gets better results then the debate is over, right? I mean, by your logic that PROVES IT.
Do I smell a prop bet, Stevie-Boy?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rounding4Rent
Another reason you probably don't believe online poker has the possibility to be rigged is because you don't understand simple business concepts/models.
Of course I believe the possibility exists. But this quote of yours is in response to me saying it wouldn't make sense to rig a game for extra profit in a $.25 NO RAKE MTT (which had just been discussed by some of the more reasonable people participating here). So perhaps it's you who is having trouble with this simple business concept - you can't make more profit on a product you're giving away for free.
Or are you saying they rig the Rake-Free MTT's to allow "the fish" to win in order to pad their bankrolls and then play higher stakes and lose to the better players, eventually, but a little slower than they should?
(God, that whole concept of rigging games "so fish don't go broke as quickly" bothers the hell out of me. How does one determine the correct rate poor players are supposed to lose all their money?)
Quote:
Originally Posted by DonkoTheClown
I do know that there is a big difference between brick and mortar and online though.
what is this big difference? the level in play? yes, the live players are, for the most part, much worse. that's true. lookit Stevie-Boy Meares, he claimed to be able to profit by playing live at an unbelievably high rate.* the only way that could be done is by playing exceptionally bad opponents.
*
Spoiler:
Quote:
Originally Posted by stephenmeares
No, I do very well in poker, like I said in my first post. Instead of it taking 2 years to earn a couple thousand on internet poker, I can sit at a cash table with 100$ and earn it in 10 hours.
Since ALL of Stevie-Boys posts were deleted for trolling in a manner which would disturb Crispin Glover on PCP, I give you this link to where the discussion of his outlandish claim begins.
I didn't even look at any other hands except for what I got knocked out of the tournaments with, numb nuts.
standard. he doesn't look at the other hands, just the last one. really a quite telling admission.
Quote:
And I didn't intend to prove online poker is rigged by posting 10 HH im simply showing why I do not win on OP as these type of things consistently happen to me.