So why is it that some people seem to never be targeted by these evil sites? GOLDENACCOUNTS?

LOL R4R, you're a strong contender for the delusional poster of the year award

And yet despite Josem's continued effort to provide real data on the issue and refute the rigtard views that are based on..... imaginary data.... it will still go in one ear and out the other

NFuego, what is your purpose here? You sound alot like Markusgc, any relation there?

I have seen no evidence of their consistent regulation. They have provided no such thing. Therefore, how can I believe they are credible? The UK Minister is irrelevant.

Obviously not, my man. It's very hard to make a point on this forum as you have to thoroughly explain things before people like you can understand them.

You're thinking very broad, thats the problem with people now.. I look at what's in front of me.
When it comes down to it - it doesn't matter how much Dwan or Robl made from online poker, that does not prove to me that it is legit.
The reality is that you are trusting something you have no clue about. It may be rigged, it may not be rigged - there is no way to be sure. If you make money from online poker, then obviously i'd reccommend you keep playing until you start seeing your luck running out. I personally had a very bad experience with online poker as poker tracker confirmed (as well as my results). From comparing my results with others who were in the same situation and seeing common patterns that a 5 year old child could recognize I used my common sense and concluded something was not right. Maybe your experience is different than mine - if that is true, I wish you the best.

You're surely not refusing to believe something because there is a lack of evidence to support your false belief, are you?

So people winning on multiple sites as well as live isn't proof of anything? If the sites have "programs" that choose when to doomswitch people, then how could people have similar results on different sites? I fail to see how this is thinking too broadly about it. About when did this happen? Couldn't have been a couple years ago when the games got harder, could it?

Well, you should know about being an irrelevance.

Yes.

When you habitually talk nonsense people do find it hard to understand.

I just wanted to highlight the awesomeness of this comment.

You refuse to believe that the regulation is credible because of a lack of evidence, yet you are happy to believe that online poker is rigged, despite a lack of evidence.

It's a superbot eh? If a site wanted to cheat you they wouldn't need a bot.

No you're wrong DUCY

My purpose in this particular thread is to drive a truck through the gaping hole formed when morons like you provide an argument.

Rounding4Rent, you sound a lot like the idiot boy shill Speven Mears.

Any relationship there?

He has previously admitted they are one and the same person, and some mod confirmed it too. It should be obvious when you compare reasoning ability.

He should make a business out of it and teach others how to exploit the rig, like this guy:

http://maxstakespoker.com/

I can't believe this thread is 517 pages long.

Only 78 if you switch to 100 posts/page.

That is hilarious! I was going to quote my favourite line, but then I realised the entire thing is gold! I think we should all chipin and get a copy for R4R!

I prefer 156 pages myself

zomg its really rigged

Four years ago the same guy (Robert Eagle) was selling "Party Poker Cracked". Now it's "Poker Stars Cracked". Same scam, same book, just edit the site name. Same guy has been selling ebooks and other junk on ebay for years. He also sells both books in a self-published paperback edition.

http://www.lulu.com/content/paperbac...cracked/179757

PS - the ebooks are all over as torrents too, if anyone wants to post some excerpts here for laughs.

Description:


And this version is only $47.50 instead of $67 for the Pokerstars one. That's like a savings of 85%! Gosh, that money will be made back in like a day and half of grinding once we've cracked the algorithm!

So if Donko reads and participates in the appropriate 2+2 Forums and gets better results then the debate is over, right? I mean, by your logic that PROVES IT.

Do I smell a prop bet, Stevie-Boy?
Of course I believe the possibility exists. But this quote of yours is in response to me saying it wouldn't make sense to rig a game for extra profit in a $.25 NO RAKE MTT (which had just been discussed by some of the more reasonable people participating here). So perhaps it's you who is having trouble with this simple business concept - you can't make more profit on a product you're giving away for free.

Or are you saying they rig the Rake-Free MTT's to allow "the fish" to win in order to pad their bankrolls and then play higher stakes and lose to the better players, eventually, but a little slower than they should?

(God, that whole concept of rigging games "so fish don't go broke as quickly" bothers the hell out of me. How does one determine the correct rate poor players are supposed to lose all their money?)
what is this big difference? the level in play? yes, the live players are, for the most part, much worse. that's true. lookit Stevie-Boy Meares, he claimed to be able to profit by playing live at an unbelievably high rate.* the only way that could be done is by playing exceptionally bad opponents.

*

standard. he doesn't look at the other hands, just the last one. really a quite telling admission.
why would anyone pick on poor lil' Stevie?
ORLY?


all in ONE day huh? wowzers, mad volume, yo.

You're bad at poker and my auditors make you lose money and use expressions from the 1950's?