Quote:
Originally Posted by riggedpoker
It's not the kind of thing that can be detected just from looking through hand histories. The only reason that hand would be marked as suspicious would be because of all in EV. But what about all those hands where I wasn't all in, but villain sucked out on turn or river? They happen way more than 43% of the time but there's no way to prove it with database analysis but I still know for a fact it's true.
Wait, wait...you can detect that 43% hands come in 90% of the time by observation, but can't prove it with your database? Seriously??
I feel really, really, bad for you if you believe all the stuff you type, and you should really think about giving up poker if you are going to keep refusing to see things from any other viewpoint. You're destined to continue making a couple of dollars here and there at the lowest stakes, and lose long term if you move up much.
And if you don't mean any of it, leveling in this thread is sort of like shooting fish in a barrel, isn't it?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tucco
Don't be shocked if everyone there tells you the same thing you are hearing in here though.
He's posted hands in strat forums before - the result is always the same. He's never, ever, ever, wrong, and he'll continue to argue for the way he played the hand being correct no matter who tells him otherwise and in the face of all logic.