Quote:
Originally Posted by Markusgc
Oh yeah, Real Deal guy. He was an actual shill I think and a weird zealot so I kind of tuned him out after a while.
Quote:
Originally Posted by jagnje
btw I am not implying that programming of the rigging is easy. I am implying that that particular part of code (if the games are fair) is pretty straightforward. To replace it with rigged code, you don't even have to tell the other programmers. You just need to find 1 crooked programmer who does the dirty job and gets paid seven figures to keep the mouth shut.
The comparision with Madoff case is straight on. Indeed, in that case, a lot of people had to know what is going on and the scam went on for decades. Even more, the regulatory institutions were warned about Madoff and they did nothing. They didn't even audit him.
There have been hundreds of poker rooms over the years, so for it to be a "straight on" comparison that would require all of them to be pulling this off without any getting caught somehow, or are your theories only for a specific room and all others are fine?
This would be like not one but hundreds of Madoffs existing. Come on now
That is a lot of massive conspiracy stuff that has never been caught involving a lot of grunts in on it, which is one of the biggest flaws in most riggedologist logic. They ignore that hundreds, maybe thousands of poker rooms have existed, so how many use this secret mystical stuff?
Interesting riggedologist trend. Seems we have gone away from flush draws winning/big stacks winning theories to more fanciful intricate rigged software that makes no sense concepts. Should get even wilder when we see that billion hand data analysis.