Quote:
Originally Posted by Devilboy666
NOW the truth comes out lol!
Cash games are much tougher than sit and gos and you will probably lose a few buyins before you get used to them.
How many hands did you play in the cash games? What stakes?
i dont have graphs here, because i am at work. i started to play more seriously poker in cash few months ago, i mean bought PT PUD and multitabled. played from zero, i mean from 30$, at microstakes, moved to something like ~400$ on stars within 3 months (about 80k hands), then i thought that it is better to play on FTP because of rakeback. deposited there 210$ played, firslty everything went fine, no st'ups, coolers (i mean normal game)played a little bit NL10$, then started to play NL25$ and moved to something like 650$, the game was fine (but in comparison with stars i had the feeling that i am getting more bad beats, setups, coolers, but pretty normal)
anyway, i took a shot to NL50$, i know is against BR manegement, but i tried. here things went wrong, i lost like 5-6 buy ins there, i mean my winnings were like 7 buy ins lower in comparison with sklansky bucks winnings. also i had coolers and setups. thats why i started to play SnGs to calm down. because if not this crap, my BR would be above 1k$. i dont like to lie to my self, i see there is no point. so i started to play SnGs, and i meet the same "problems" i thought omg, again. donks raising with 74 against mine 99, and hitinh set on the river, again mine Aj against A3 is not good and i am in 4th place, again mine Aj agains Qj is not good and i am on 4th place. a lot of such crap. i never had such experience on stars.
ok maybe its variance, but someone can calclutae the possibilities of such variance? i mean is it possible to use hands history in order to check normal amount of coolers, set ups, bad beats is possible to calculate by sklansky bucks, but what about other two?