Quote:
Originally Posted by UncleDeezie
^^If I'm delusional and paranoid for wanting facts and evidence, then what are you for believing all this information without facts and evidence?
The facts are that despite mirrions of poker players watching the OLP sites like hawks there is no evidence that OLP is rigged.
From these facts I believe that there is an vanishingly small probability that OLP is rigged.
Seems very sensible to me.
Your position, based on the same (lack of) evidence is that you are 'concerned' and would like some 'third party' like some machina ex deus to verify that all is well.
You are paranoind because you have serious concerns without a single shred of credible evidence and you are delusional because you have some blind faith that a 'third party' could fathom out some truth about the riggedness of a site that isn't apparant from the scrutiny of mirrions of players.
Quote:
By your classification, I am not a "rigtard".
Oh yes you are.
And a particularly stupid one because you have some daft belief that a PS that was up to no good would be unable to pull the wool over the eyes of some 'third party'.
They could show him all the software listings under the sun together with diagrammes and schematics of their entire operation but there is nothing in the world to say that they are running the software that he sees or that if they are at the time he visits they won't change it for a rigged version the moment his back is turned.
Quote:
If verified third party testing was done, my mind would 100% be at ease. The reason why I would be at ease is because it wouldn't make sense whatsoever to dupe the 3rd party testers and risk the chance of being caught. OLP is a CASH COW. Ginormous amounts of money are made every hour simply doing it 100% legit. There's no reason to risk that by running some kind of shady software. Now this argument could be made now, but with absolutely no testing being done, then that argument is nullified.
You write that with not the vaguest idea of just how idiotic you make yourself appear with your wholly inconsistant ideas.
You've explained very clearly why it would be absurd for an OLP site to rig the software, and the reasons you give are good.
Then you spoil it all by reitterating the idiotic belief that some third party is in some way less likely to be duped and can verify the operation of the site. There is just no sense whatsoever to that position.