Since you seem to have posted here for years (as opposed to a healthy amount of the hit and run riggedologists (like - one word - hackers guy), and since you responded to an earlier post of mine please allow me to offer some possibilities to your concerns.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jussurreal
Do you not realize that the guys who own these places probably have enough resources to come up with programs that fit into your poker tracking programs (that are available for the masses) and still gives them control of hand results?
This requires one to be a blind believer of the "make it so" software platform. You say what you want it to do and it magically does it with no one ever finding out.
Stars has dealt billions and billions of hands. Other rooms have also dealt billions of hands. They make money from rake on those hands (even tourney ones through the buy in). Nearly every hand is boring and unmemorable, yet when the strange things happen as they will at times people look for reasons.
The reasons are simple. Billions of hands will yield to varying degrees all sorts of strange things.
I even posted my hand in stud of runner runner quads losing to runner runner runner straight flush. I thought it was funny, because it was.
Why in any practical sense would a room cheat in this way? I am talking real world, not made up conspiracy world. Sometimes the proposed crime is just to inefficient and pointless and risky in the context of the industry that that in and by itself deters it from happening.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jussurreal
Guys wake up here. I'm not saying I know 100% that online poker is rigged, but as a winning player online and off, I can say that online poker is nothing like offline. Too many wildly strange things happen online that make it extremely suspicious.
You are saying "online poker is rigged." People who try to dance around their riggedologist beliefs are annoying, just accept who you are.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jussurreal
At poker room I lost 11 consecutive all in hands where I was statistically dominate at 70% or above. I never played there again of course. I also won a spot at the online poker classic from there starting at a 50 dollar satellite. 1 attempt and I made it to a 5200 dollar seat. I cashed it out because they gave us the option to play or cash out the seat when the UIGEA was passed. I do not count this money as money I have won online when I say I am a winner online.
So ask yourself what you are proposing. Were they targeting you specifically? Do you really think they can set it up where 70% favorites lose every time and no one has noticed but you? And no one has the data base to prove it even with it happening all the time?
You had an unlucky streak (if it actually happened - many stretch reality in these cases) and that streak messed with your head and you created a set of beliefs to explain something that was simply a bad bit of luck at best (no idea how you played the actual hands but many riggedologists play quite badly and assign blame elsewhere).
I missed a spot for an event in Manila when with 4 people left on Titan (3 spots) after nearly an hour of very tough play I lost an all in when my 10 10 got called by 9 2 suited preflop. It made zero sense until the guy screamed "OMG I MISCLICKED!"
Sometimes $%^&^ happens.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jussurreal
Enough things have happened at the other sites too that have me questioning every site out there. House players stats can be made up to give to the performance tracking websites.
Then they selectively pick some players that they will let win consistantly, and you have the public completely fooled and you are a multi billionaire.
That is called basic paranoia and you are creating beliefs to validate the paranoid tendencies such as house players/bots are out there to get us all with the add-on that you cannot catch them since they will alter the stats...
Try using this type of thinking and logic in other aspects of life and see how your friends and family react.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jussurreal
Not saying this is the case but you are not thinking straight if you say its not possible.
Lots of bad guys do bad things in this world, but usually there is a motive that makes sense. In this case everyone assumes it is about making more money, but if all of the poker sites are secretly sinister , dark, evil companies the fact is that they would commit crimes that were a lot better then nearly all of the paranoid riggedology suggestions, including yours.
Last, no one buys the " I am not saying I believe this, but" routine. If you are going to have these beliefs that is your right, but at least acquire a set of testicles to stand behind them like some of the other riggedologists have done. Sure I think they are a bit out there but at least they are proud of their beliefs.
All the best.