Awwwwww, little boy can dish it out but can't take it. Must be that time of the month.

What are you wittering on about?

A dislike of being misrepresented is nothing to do with his occasional bitchfests.

Either link to a thread where he has indicated that he has complete faith in sites or be seen as a liar.

After 4 months of Cake and Bodog, I'm gonna have to say yes.
But by "yes," I'm stating that the cards themselves do not reflect actual odds, that a 3:1 favorite will not win 75% time, more so like 66%.
Countless times I have witnessed on Bodog, where HU hands will flip flop leads in action fashion.
i.e. KQ vs AK
Flop: 3 Q 5
Turn: A
River: K

I don't understand how the same player can continuously get away with 4:1 underdogs and not be punished. I also have witnessed many more coolers than what i believe to be statistically normal.

Anyway, what also adds to my "theory" is the fact that when I first started on cake after BF, I was flopping two pair and sets like it was my job, running $100 into 3.5k in less than a week. I've gained a lot of experience and feel I've become a lot better in those 4 quick months, however the results are inverse. My All in EV at cake has me projected at 5300, I only have 2100 in profit, furthermore running 400 bb's under on bodog for just this week, dunno what to do.

That's my two cents, but even though the cards imo are not random, the game will always be beatable...

The rigged side have no evidence. All you have is "feelings" and mistrust.

There is no blind faith. Nobody has ever presented anything suspicious despite many looking so it seems fair to assume there is nothing suspicious.

It sounds like you have a decent database so why haven't you checked out that AK hit/miss suited flop stat? Or have you checked and not liked what you saw? It was explained how and why one aspect of your original accusation could be checked so here is your arena for providing the evidence to shut the "shills" up.

Well you can prove it but you don't, probably because it hasn't happened. The wallet analogy is apt. Apt! If you want to let your hatred of pokersites get in the way of a logical argument I'd suggest you're the idiot.

Have you actually analysed these frequencies, or is it your estimation? People are very bad at estimating statistics, which is why we need to actually capture data and analyse it statistically.

Heaters happen, and it feels like you're a winner rather than just getting a randomly good run at the cards. Anyone with experience playing will have felt the same thing (and the opposite where everything seems to be rigged against you) - we cannot help it.

This post makes you look intelligent and mysterious.

All of us shills are intelligent and mysterious.

It's part of the job description.

Refresher courses can be beneficial

So, as a riggie - basically, a customer, where do you think I need to do the most work, the intelligence or the mysteriousness?

Providing a top quality service is always at the top of my agenda.

I expect riggies value mystery over intelligence.

He's not wrong, he's right. Any data held by any agency other than the site where it originated will likely be incomplete.

Any testing done on incomplete data will produce approximate conclusions only.

That's one reason why this 'debate' will never be concluded.

Although there are hundreds of millions of HH's out there no one will ever collect them all.

And for a confirmed riggie that means that there will always be somewhere he can claim the rigging is hiding.

However, for normal people, the fact that there are so many people with large HH collections, many of whom are quite capable of the stats required to check them, together with the complete absence of any credible example of rigging, is enough to provide persuasive evidence that OLP is probably not rigged.

That's clever.

That's as maybe, but with hole-card information persuasive has a chance of becoming conclusive.

I claim to have ten black dogs. You say you won't believe me unless I show you. I show you nine black dogs to support my claim. Are you then satisfied my claim is valid?

But, even if a site tried to supply the full data, hard core riggies would simply claim that the data was either faked, or incomplete.

Thus there would no point in them even trying.

And the fact that the vast majority of players do not seem to allow concerns about rigging to stop them playing means it's really not something the sites need to worry about.

Hell, even most of the rigtards keep playing when they believe that the sites are heavily rigged against them.

Generally, I would be satisfied that there was a very high probability that your claim was valid.

Of course, if I had reason to distrust you I might assume that even if you showed me 10 black dogs, they were not all your own, or, perhaps, that some were white dogs dyed black.

Good fun though aint it?

Why would I rig my dogs? What could I possibly gain from it?

One black dog is more than enough for me for the time being.

The old ones are the best:

http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=1879493

Er, more rake?

True.

The most complete example of this that I've seen.

LOL. Keep up the good work.

I would have to disagree there. If he showed me 9 dogs in an attempt to prove that he has 10 dogs, then it's very likely that he actually has 9 dogs.

If it was blatantlyfrigged I would assume he'd stolen nine dogs.

I disagree again. I would feel honoured to be introduced to his family. Though I rather suspect that if br needed to prove he had both a mum and a sister, he would only need to show me one dog.

Why would I withhold evidence that would vindicate my claim? My reluctance to offer up all of the evidence should be reason enough to distrust me.

Don’t start on posts bar boy your 18,036 at 10 minutes a post = 3006 hours
At 8 hours per day = 375 days
You claim. Over the last 5 years average 11 hours a week winning 22,251.41 = $38.90 an hour
If you played poker instead of posting you would have won $116,933.40
.
If you had of played 8 hours a day [$311.20]5 days a week [$1556] over 5 years you would have won $404,560
.
WTF do you post ????????????????????????????????????????