Quote:
Originally Posted by dbcooper279
Not to mention how difficult it would be to create an algorithm that needs to re-distribute equity to players based on how recently they deposited/how long the tournament has been going on. Then they would need to keep track of who they've made run good/bad and correct that, so when you analyze a large sample, there is no discrepancy compared to a non-rigged site.
There´s no need to create an algorithm to re-distribute equity to players. An algorithm that makes favorite hands win less frequent than expected yet close to the expected is enough. The site wants to keep the money in the table the longer they can, there is only one way to make that, and a simple one, TO MAKE FAVORITE HANDS WIN A LITTLE LESS FREQUENT THAN EXPECTED.
And thats why bad beats are so frequent in online poker rooms.
They can change algorithm from time to time, like that DOOM button everyone imagines.
Dont ask for proofs, I dont have. But sometimes we should not ask why would someone do something, but rather why they wouldn´t.