It's blatantly obvious the defenders of the RNG are site employees or rakeback shills.
Why else would they even care to respond so passionately?

As for the required proof. You submit 500 hands they say NOPE you need 5000 to prove anything. You submit 5000 it's then 50000...

And yes it is a perfectly rational assumption that they would cheat via the deal if they were willing to commit other crimes IE money laundering.
One would think that's common sense. Guess not.

No one in this thread has submitted anything resembling proof.

And you haven't been able to fly to the moon in your car.

Both are impossible.

What's your point, shilltard?

BTW. I know it might be REALLY hard for you to grasp. But did you ever think of the normal "proof" that is required to prosecute someone has already been presented in this case.

If you idiots held such high standards of proof to criminal cases, prosecutors would have to have video footage of the person shooting the victim in the head to get a guilty verdict.

What is a rakeback shill?

Speed is a measurable output of the drug dealer's car. We don't need to see how the car is powered. It could be a gasoline engine, hamsters, or fred flintstone style. One only needs to look at the output to determine if a speed violation has occurred.

Thoroughly enjoyable. Wish I'd witnessed that but I rarely play online. Of course if it had been five royal flushes in a row followed by five full houses it would have been even more evidence to prove it isn't rigged.

So anyone who ever has done anything illegal must also be a thief? I speed doing 72 in a 60, am I also a thief.. What about if I decide to smoke some pot, drink or gamble at age 20, ect.. Does that make me a thief? I would say that 95% of people have committed a come crime by age 21.. But hey, enjoy being prefect..

My only thing is why would the sites even do this. Before you say to make money LDO, I can think of so many good ways to make money if you don't care about breaking the law.. Why not just start selling cocaine, get into sex trafficking, or build an army and invade some country with oil. I know sounds silly, but remember they were ACCUSED of money laundering once, so they are much more likely to be doing these things. Why stop and saying they are stealing, Full tilt killed my father while pokerstars raped my mother.. AP just wanted my wallet and got the **** out of there.

don't bother sync, logic doesn't work with these people

Almost unbelievably, the quality of this thread has been diminishing even further of late.

This is incredibly imbecilic.

Its not 1/1000th as imbecilic as the ridiculous assertion to which he was responding.

Quit posting. Every post you make is at least 50% ******ed. Gee, what a shock you suck at online poker. I guess if you have to wipe the drool off of the keyboard after every hand its harder to multitable.

Why is it that shills almost never address an argument with logic but just throw out inanities like the above.

Explain why you think it imbecilic, lest you be thought a witless fool.

Cocopoco would need to post quite a bit of good sense to raise his game to 50% ******ed, overall.

Not sure that is within the parameters of his intellectual ability.

That's the way the scumbag mind works. It's not the way honest people think.

You mean the assertion that any organisation willing to employ underhandedness in their finances could possibly use a variety of shady means to make money?

The first part of his post is a tired logical fallacy along the lines of 'all crows are black, therefore all black things are crows.

The second part sounds like the outline to a script for a b movie starring some really bad actors. No one would buy it.

So true.

Except that locococo said they 'would' rather than they 'could'. Which makes syncmaster's observation perfectly reasonable.

LOL, exactly! He was showing the propositional fallacy of affirming the consequent by example.

Again, he's using the absurdity of the original suggestion to create an intendedly absurd parody.

You would think that because you aren't completely braindead like the rigtards.

If he had claimed he could fly his car to the moon you would expect some evidence before you believed him. It is not impossible to prove a rigged deal and it certainly isn't impossible for you to provide data that illustrates the events that have turned you into a paranoid 'tard.

Reading compreshension fail or just changing the subject?

You mean a bit like all (alleged) money launderers are (alleged) criminals therefore all (alleged) money launderers are probably guilty of any other crimes you see fit to accuse them of however ridiculous the accusation is?

A 'perfectly rational assumption that they would', is not a concrete statement that they would, rather a suggestion that they could...

... and this:

Is true of every logical fallacy presented by 'non-riggies' since the following:

... which is a perfectly reasonable statement. (Note the use of the word 'likely').

Fail.

Look at all the shills gangbanging me.. Lol!

ITT

Right because speeding is in the same category as money laundering and racketeering.

LMAO