Of course u will say this king of felt u are a shill....anytime any1 gives examples thats what u do ...so why should we you are here to say its varience or its happens or you are just unlucky...Or the 1 i like best is u dont know what u are doing...lol!

looooooooool.........good answer!

Wasn't aware. I'm in.

Great comparison ...you now have changed my mind i now believe i suck at the pokers because i would never starve my kids or kill my parents u sir are the man!

Another idiotic post because thats what he said exactly....good 1 shill!

Maybe I didn't miss the fact that some shills self banned themselves but I didn't see the point considering how dull (silent) it was last time we did it.

Maybe a shill thought it would be fun to create a long winded gimmick post but is disappointed that nobody showed much interest despite his effort.

Maybe said shill thought Wiki in particular wouldn't be able to resist responding to it but is disappointed he hasn't posted.

Maybe it is ironic said shill is complaining about other shills "muddying the water" by breaking the self ban they never agreed to whilst themselves breaking their own self ban.

& u believe this?

You agree with what I wrote do you? Good to know...

Maybe the riggies were already starting to gather around that theoretical post in a nice way (math riggies thinking how it helped weaker players, other riggies challenging shills to argue it etc)., and maybe the next gimmick post like that should be made with a bit more obvious help for shills to identify it as a gimmick. I know, perhaps the words Wingo_Woy, Mingo_Moy and Qingo_Qoy will be added at some point as secret code words.


Anyway, maybe I felt bad because a couple of honest, well intending hard working shills missed the thread boycott call and were debating a fake (which was the reason I theoretically broke the silence), but I only feel theoretically half as bad now, so carry on the battle, and good luck.

To remind the rigges, there was a good post to build on. Here it is again. See you in a couple weeks.

I don't want to get caught up in the semantics but they do operate in the USA, they don't operate within the USA. The states haven't done much because the feds tried to eliminate the funding of internet poker rather than pass a new federal law that declares internet poker illegal and making all the citizens who play criminals.

But I agree that the PPA and online sites are trying to get the funding of internet poker legal in the US.

I don't see the point in creating gimmick posts to induce stupity because there is so much to enjoy here anyway. If you did the same last time it certainly didn't make the thread very entertaining.

Despite my snarky post, although I noticed some people were taking a break from the thread I didn't appreciate it was a full blown self ban because the experiment was such a failure last time. If I had realised it was happening again I would have chirped up because there is no point in anybody doing it unless we all do it.

So I guess I'm in.

Or you should read the piece of **** code you posted and compare it to the Nevada gaming statutes. Maybe you might conclude that the IOM regulations are relatively ineffective and toothless. Plus, as has been pointed out many times with Russ Hamilton, which of these island countries ever prosecuted a violation of their gambling codes?

It's so easy to find such information through google, heaven forbid you read its content.

Actually it is a good answer. I hope the original poster sends in the HH so Josem can look them up and share the results.

lol this is so much fun (talking to u shills) it reminds of when going to a restuarant & changing ur mind 4-5 times b4 u order u guys are good & i hope u get paid well for your time....

Wait.....just one second...........yes.........must be..........

Do you guys think Wills Dad is Monteroy? I think he might be.

You had the wooled pulled over our eyes there for a few pages, Monty. Good job.

Now I see the similarities between the "inducer" and the "no-action" hand. Although I think the "inducer" sounds much better and will really catch on.

Sorry i had to break the silence
You freaky ignorant moron since when Canada is an island!

Btw Absolute poker was own by amerindian mafia when the scandal happens! and our government are very scared of them , they are free to do almost anything on their reserve since the oka crysis. If people had done some research about the owner they will never put money in the first place!

this is certainly not true for PokerStars, and probably not true for any other online poker site in the top 10 highest-traffic sites on pokerscout.

ty

yes joker, i agree, this was a classic response.

Been thinking about it and I have come up with one way that sites can rig the software to increase their income without it showing up in a statistical analysis.

1. Create a mode of poker where people are transfered to a new table after every hand
2. Claim that the person at the table that hasn't paid the BB in the longest period of time is the BB for that hand
3. Have it appear to each player that they are the BB and the person to their right is the SB etc.
4. Only put 1 BB and 1 SB into the pot before the flop.
5. Profit.

Seems reasonable right?

sounds like rush poker at full tilt to me. funny guy.
Has nothing to do with the real rigging which moves old money to new money, over and over, to create re-buy after re-buy.

The site would "do other things"? Like what more advertising? In this question, we assume that they have already tried obvious ethical options. If it came down to a choice of either going bankrupt or cheating the players, what would a poker site do? It's not a nonsense question by any means. Its a perfectly rational question. Its a scenario that could easily come up, originating in mismanagement of assets or legal restrictions to markets of players. Giving a fish a 5% boost could keep him playing for years more. Multiply that by the number of fish and you start getting into some huge numbers in terms of rake. And don't kid yourself, it's all about the rake to them and not a damn thing else.

I was aware of the Isle of man regulatory commission. I had them confused with the kawanake gaming commission. I get my dog and pony shows mixed up sometimes excuse me.

Pokerstars has about the best customer service I have ever encountered short of a few upper end restaurants I have been to. But that only makes me trust them less. Its almost like their core business is not to provide poker but to create this mirage. Their customer service staff are intelligent college grads. They respond quickly, which means they are adequately staffed. That takes sooooo much money. What are they trying to compensate for? What are they trying to hide?

re-read it and try to comprehend the implications

(since the shill boycott seems to have been a flop anyway)

Please tell me you're a Poe.

DO you know how much a pot needs to be raised to cap the rake.(action hands?)
DO you realise that math is not relevant to meny of these so called poker sites.
DO you read how Pros have come out before (not the ones with million dollar contracts)
telling you these sites are bogus.

DO you understand that PS is not a law abiding registered US company.
Where is the million hand post flop analysis?
DO you ignore other studys on PS that involves more hands than this spaceassbumshills study,That contradict all what this, lost in space guy has er .........published??? on PS alone.
Do you have no life only the one that is based around your selfworth and ignorant views in this thread that includes rambo tough posts on other posters with no regard for respect only to shill your sole objective.

DO you still deposit?
Welcome to the world of a billion dollar company and all the evils that rake will provide.
DO you realise more than 1 poker site in the past has ripped off its customers in one way or another and others still do today.
DO you like bots.DO you like collusion.DO you like horses. Do you like ghosting.Do you like teamplay Do you like account selling deep in Trnys.

ETHICS have no place when it comes to online poker only fleecing ignorant fools of money.

Never deposit on an online pokersite if you like money.

DO you want me to tell you more?