Yes truth it seems the battle is personal against you do not waste your time with these " oh goody I posted on 3 threads now I am up to 3000 posts hooray individuals" (To Be polite) If you have ever been the only one in a large group or poker forum to defend someone or something that you know is wrong, then you are what we consider a hero. Standing up for what you believe in at all times is not only one of the most admirable traits a person can possess but it brings envy from bottom feeders who can not do the same in return for themselves or somebody they so called love. Great Job!

Only a fool has himself as a client. I can assure you with your attitude on life and people you will need to look it up someday. Have a nice day!

to wiki the shill,

ive asked 3 times already,

why poker sites dont agree to be regulated by an honured company?

u prefer to call everbody in names instead of answer that.

i think i know why u dont answer, becuase the answer is bad 4 u.

till the sites wont agree to be regulated they will never can say that they r Innocent. because Innocent organization which have nothing to hide wont refuse to be regulated.

waiting to ur comment, and pls, i give u respect, so act the same. no names or any misbehaviour.

A ladie,woman or bitch whatever floats your boat please I have heard them all.

lol

He hate me!

Dear Shills & Riggies,

While I still keep up with this thread for the same reason I read Fail Blog I pretty much don't post here any more because my time is better spent helping players who actually want to learn the game. However, I'm in the middle of moving and finding a new apartment and it's all turned into a major PITA. So rather than picking fights with landlords, real estate agents or my wife, instead I'll be abusing some of the bigger morons in this thread until I put down first and last on my new happy place.

Enjoy!

why pizza delivery drivers dont agree to be regulated by an honured company?

why florists dont agree to be regulated by an honured company?

why secretaries dont agree to be regulated by an honured company?

why knitters dont agree to be regulated by an honured company?

Your question is nonsense. Nobody is regulated by "an honured company". Some industries and professions like accountants, doctors and plumbers are regulated by various government agencies. But only when required. Most professions and businesses do not require licensing and regulation beyond perhaps a basic vendor's permit or similar.

Obviously your semi-literate posts are actually asking, "Why aren't poker sites licensed and regulated in the USA" and the answer is, "For the same reason newspaper delivery boys aren't". Because there is no requirement for licensing and no mechanism to do so.

The largest poker sites are regulated, including licensing, within jurisdictions which require such - For example France and Italy. Of course, like the rest of the racist, xenophobe riggies in this thread I'm sure this is irrelevant to you however it none the less puts the lie to your barely coherent ramblings.

to cry me a river,

wow, so much Lack of basic knowledge. anyone can tell that u never took even one lesson on economics.

evereything is regulated. deliverys? they have driving licenes, and get checked every day by their manager (so they cant steal or anything).

knitters? try to sell one mechine without it have been checked by the authorities.

we r talking here about a billions of dollars industry, that have a lot of chances to steal from their clients.

any software company is regulated so they cant abuse theire clients.

and u know what? let say that u right (u completly not) the sites have a chance to prove theire innocence, a thing that will 4 sure increase their incomes, so why dont they take that Opportunity, everyone knows that this industry is on major decline, does that wont help theme?

all that bussines smeles bad, and they dont try to prove their innocence, why?

p.s: like casinos have the need to be regulated (a proven fact) so is the need for those sites. so there is a reason and there is a need to regulations on that bussines.

But that's not the owner of PokerStars in the video at the start. How can you trust a video that can't even correctly identify the guy they think is the mass mastermind of the site?

why florists dont agree to be regulated by an honured company?
Lol first when do you see them making millions in annual profit and using multiple bank accounts from various investigated foreign banks with shady banking practices oh by the way there are state regulations that florist have to abide by but you already know that right

why secretaries don't agree to be regulated by an honored company?
If they don't agree they do not have a job! No corporation will hire a secretary without a background check and an honored background corporation does this whether they agree or not!

Because there is no requirement for licensing and no mechanism to do so.
Pff so this op does not see the need or requirement for regulation for any industry that deals with monetary funds he must keep his money in a tin can. he must go to a doctor in a back room alley for his exams?

The increasingly complex network of all gaming sites is causing people or players to question how and if it is honestly regulated. Many forum OPs here have no substance to their claims that they really are regulated honestly. Just like they reply that these individuals that have no data to make a valid claim that poker sites are rigged or unfair there is no OP here who can be verified that he is a valid auditor or employee from any credible regulatory corporation! Fair is Fair!!

If a site wanted to knock out people faster, why wouldn't they just shorten the blind levels or increase the pace at which they increase?

That would be the obvious way of doing it without the risk of concocting this bizarre international conspiracy.

Also, are you more likely to play poker when you suffer from a cooler? I played a tournament last night, and lost with my AA to another guy's KK. I didn't play any more for the evening.

onlinepokerisascam,

A couple of the world's largest sites have their random shuffling checked by Cigital, the world's largest computer security consulting company.

They're clearly reputable and reliable, so your comments really don't make much sense.

I only watched about 20 seconds of that video (the audio quality was just unbearable, and its 18 mins long), but are you saying Isai Scheinberg isn't a major owner of Pokerstars?

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/new...icle784745.ece

Was that story wrong, or did the Scheinbergs sell their share?

listen idiot will i go thru all 3900 posts that u made to point out bad grammer no i wont...but i see u will GL ....u should go thru all the threads & point out bad grammer because thats all you are good at ...SIR!

josem dont u have some detective work to do on stars or are u guys that slow they pay u here to shill also?

LOL u sir are an idiot this i know!

I'm saying the photo of the guy in the video isn't who they say it is.

O please shill beat your useless drum!

show us the real time hand history or it didnt happen!

See, the thing is, when I call you or one of your fellow ******s an idiot I show the working.

You and your gang, on the other hand, just say: "You're an idiot". (Or, more often: "Your an idiot").

That's the subtle difference.

No sir u are wrong u are constantly running down guys here that have an opinion & only an opinion let them chat as we let u chat!

ok guys would like to stay & argue more but i have money that stars wants me to give away ...im outta here!

If, during your chat, you start posting inanities, I'm afraid that you can be certain that they will be pointed out.

regulated mean review on a regular basis, a surprise reviews, and researchs of the numbers and see if they have a mathematical logic. that never happend, and the poker sites refuse to that kind of Reviews. so? why r they refuse? answer to that.

btw, wiki is an extremly rude, he should realy change his attitude becuase right now he makes 2p2 looks like realy ametuer site.

common, we r all poker buddies, stop with all that swears, it is so unrelevant.

According to who? And you know this for a fact because...?

Wait, what?

You try pointing out what you thought was a mistake in his post, and are shown to be wrong - so you whine about him pointing out bad grammar?

Seriously?