Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
The great "Poker is rigged" debate - Collected threads edition The great "Poker is rigged" debate - Collected threads edition
View Poll Results: Is Online Poker Rigged?
Yes
3,502 34.88%
No
5,607 55.85%
Undecided
930 9.26%

10-09-2010 , 12:14 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by fknregs
I would like to test/analyze/proove if a certain site X is "rigged for action". How many hands do I need to have a valid sample? Are obvserved hands sufficient or would it be much better with holecards?
Where do I get percentage data how often "flush over flush", "FH over flush", "set over set"... at 6max is normal/expected?
According to the rigtards you don't need to know how often something is happening or how often it should happen. You just decide that something "feels" wrong because you can't win.

Quote:
Originally Posted by ILoveMyBum
In the DoN's the worst starting hand wins more often than it should when 2 players are all in preflop. This way the bad players don't lose their money as quickly and leave the site. Its best for the site to spread the money around.
Like this guy. (Yes. I have decided you can't win with no evidence to back it up and stated it as fact.)
The great "Poker is rigged" debate - Collected threads edition Quote
10-09-2010 , 12:17 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ILoveMyBum
In the DoN's the worst starting hand wins more often than it should
a DoN theory, k,
you have a sample h/h?
and why do you think the rigged decks are used on the DoN's again?
The great "Poker is rigged" debate - Collected threads edition Quote
10-09-2010 , 03:06 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by OneOut
I don't think either side has provides solid "proof". It's kind of like religion. Can anybody really ever provide solid proof either way?

All anyone can ever do is post the information they have and provoke thought, intelligent coversation, and more questions.

People who jump in here and say "OMG It's rigged!" and post their Aces getting cracked twice are killing everyone else who wants to have a serious discussion just as those who just call everyone rigtards or shills aren't adding anything constructive either.
Yes to the bolded part. The problem is every idea of how a site can be rigged can be tested statistically to see if it falls within expectation, or deviates too far from it.

The only issue is sample size, but if you don't want to play millions of hands on site x you can just buy them, they are cheap too. Or get them for free for research purposes from some site that datamines for this purpose.

And yes, people have done tests like this without finding anything wrong in the deal. The problem with people that believe it's rigged is they don't want to do the work, and don't know how to do the work. That's where the term rigtards comes from I reckon, they keep shouting something that they could prove but don't even try, just keep shouting.

Look at the level of grammar, sentencing, logic flow of the average 'rigtard' vs the average 'shill' ITT and you'll begin to see why...
The great "Poker is rigged" debate - Collected threads edition Quote
10-09-2010 , 09:15 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by obviously.bogus
Conventional wisdom, that has been posted many times in this train wreck of a thread, if you have the patience to read thru and find the posts is that ...

Action flops would increase variance.
Therefore, the fish would go broke faster.
Therefore, the fish would give up and not re-deposit.
Therefore, some regs/pros would give up as there would be fewer fish,
Therefore, the whole poker economy is depressed and the site earns less money.

I'm not convinced that all the "therefores" are true, but I'm not saying they are not true.
It's also been shown fairly convincingly that action flops would probably decrease overall rake, not increase it as commonly argued. And this is even before the games start dying per the above points.

Last edited by spadebidder; 10-09-2010 at 09:22 PM.
The great "Poker is rigged" debate - Collected threads edition Quote
10-09-2010 , 09:35 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ILoveMyBum
In the DoN's the worst starting hand wins more often than it should when 2 players are all in preflop. This way the bad players don't lose their money as quickly and leave the site. Its best for the site to spread the money around.
This is ridiculously easy to prove, so feel free to show your proof.
The great "Poker is rigged" debate - Collected threads edition Quote
10-09-2010 , 11:01 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by otatop
This is ridiculously easy to prove, so feel free to show your proof.
He's too busy looking at himself in the mirror backwards, DUCY ?
The great "Poker is rigged" debate - Collected threads edition Quote
10-10-2010 , 01:29 AM
The great "Poker is rigged" debate - Collected threads edition Quote
10-10-2010 , 01:33 AM
Quote:
Do you not realize that "rigging for action" would actually hurt a site more than help it?
No, because they rig it so the action flop hits the good player and he can't fold. Then the donk is given the miracle card. All the sites actions are geared toward the donks because if they aren't helped the total site handle would be cut by at least 30 to 30 percent.
The great "Poker is rigged" debate - Collected threads edition Quote
10-10-2010 , 02:57 AM
30 to 30 percent... man, that's a huge difference. so, if the sites are rigged for the donky, then why are you complaining, your about to be a rich man!
The great "Poker is rigged" debate - Collected threads edition Quote
10-10-2010 , 03:54 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by banonlinepoker
No, because they rig it so the action flop hits the good player and he can't fold. Then the donk is given the miracle card. All the sites actions are geared toward the donks because if they aren't helped the total site handle would be cut by at least 30 to 30 percent.
This deserves an epic facepalm...actually this entire thread does
The great "Poker is rigged" debate - Collected threads edition Quote
10-10-2010 , 04:38 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by banonlinepoker
No, because they rig it so the action flop hits the good player and he can't fold. Then the donk is given the miracle card. All the sites actions are geared toward the donks because if they aren't helped the total site handle would be cut by at least 30 to 30 percent.
Yup, pretty solid evidence there.

If I was going to see my 'handle' drop from 30% to 30% I'd certainly think seriously about rigging my site.
The great "Poker is rigged" debate - Collected threads edition Quote
10-10-2010 , 11:10 AM
Seems pretty rigged if they can make it impossible for you to fold
The great "Poker is rigged" debate - Collected threads edition Quote
10-10-2010 , 11:57 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by banonlinepoker
No, because they rig it so the action flop hits the good player and he can't fold. Then the donk is given the miracle card.
Quote:
Originally Posted by TBobLP
Seems pretty rigged if they can make it impossible for you to fold
I'd do an animated GIF, except that its a lot of work for such a small joke, but picture in you mind a table with A Q A J and Hero has A A ... the river comes T ... villain shoves ... and Hero's fold button is greyed out ... no matter how many clicks nothing happens ... Hero has to call
The great "Poker is rigged" debate - Collected threads edition Quote
10-11-2010 , 02:19 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by banonlinepoker
No, because they rig it so the action flop hits the good player and he can't fold. Then the donk is given the miracle card. All the sites actions are geared toward the donks because if they aren't helped the total site handle would be cut by at least 30 to 30 percent.
wrong.... and wow, you're really losin it aren't you?
The great "Poker is rigged" debate - Collected threads edition Quote
10-11-2010 , 03:37 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by NFuego20
wrong.... and wow, you're really losin it aren't you?
I'm pretty much convinced that BOP is a regular poster here who just uses that account to mouth off from time to time.

Yes, there really are people as stupid as he appears to be but they generally make at least some attempt to hide the fact.
The great "Poker is rigged" debate - Collected threads edition Quote
10-11-2010 , 06:37 PM
It took me seven days and 3 hours to get here from page 1!
The great "Poker is rigged" debate - Collected threads edition Quote
10-11-2010 , 08:02 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Real_Owen
It took me seven days and 3 hours to get here from page 1!
At 8 hours per day that's 8 seconds a post. Skimming isn't allowed, please start over.
The great "Poker is rigged" debate - Collected threads edition Quote
10-11-2010 , 08:15 PM
you sure is a hard task master mr spade,
but you are right
if you are going to do something, you just cant skim like that
The great "Poker is rigged" debate - Collected threads edition Quote
10-11-2010 , 08:43 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by spadebidder
At 8 hours per day that's 8 seconds a post. Skimming isn't allowed, please start over.
Are you using an old browser and single tabbing?

Firefox and 24 tabbing ftw !!!
The great "Poker is rigged" debate - Collected threads edition Quote
10-11-2010 , 09:22 PM
UB and AP are not on the up and up. Besides the security breaches, they have a history of software 'bugs' and do not refund money because of them. I lost out on a bunch of MTT's because of these 'bugs'.

In my experience...FTP seems to be streaky. You either run hot or cold. It also seems to allow bad poker players to run hot against solid ones. Spewing and head scratching calls on all-ins sucking out that 4, 5, 9 to one (or worse) odds. It is in Full Tilts best interest that no one wins too much money, so there could possibly be a handicap system coded into the software.

But...like what happens in brick and mortar or home games....it could be explained as a donkey on a heater. You can't beat a donkey on a heater. In fact, you will lose money hand over fist.
The great "Poker is rigged" debate - Collected threads edition Quote
10-11-2010 , 09:32 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by obviously.bogus
Are you using an old browser and single tabbing?

Firefox and 24 tabbing ftw !!!
lmao these n00bs
The great "Poker is rigged" debate - Collected threads edition Quote
10-12-2010 , 12:59 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Real_Owen
It took me seven days and 3 hours to get here from page 1!
Damn thats some dedication.
The great "Poker is rigged" debate - Collected threads edition Quote
10-12-2010 , 01:12 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Real_Owen
It took me seven days and 3 hours to get here from page 1!
And your conclusion?
The great "Poker is rigged" debate - Collected threads edition Quote
10-12-2010 , 01:20 AM
Those who say they know online poker is not rigged are naive beyond description. Young people mostly, with a dream to become rich off of online poker. Vigorously defending that dream. The world is a ruthless place people.

THE SITES ARE NOT REGULATED IN THE USA. That means anything goes and billions are at stake. You trust they do the right thing and give random cards so you can have a fair game? hahaha.

BTW I'm up thousands online, been playing online since it started. Still play because I get a poker itch (its addictive believe it or not) and want to play even though I think the game is rigged.

The suckouts and streaks of bad beats you go through online are not seen in live poker. That is the bottom line. Has nothing to do with seeing more hands. I've seen more live hands than many here in this thread have seen online.

The sites can make billions more a year by manipulating certain people and certain situations. They don't know how long they will be able to operate in the US, and never have known for sure. BILLIONS are at stake. But yeah everyone playing on the sites is getting fair cards. I think many here arguing are just from the sites, but to those that aren't....you have a lot to learn in the game of life. You have a lot to learn about human nature.
The great "Poker is rigged" debate - Collected threads edition Quote
10-12-2010 , 01:27 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jussurreal
Those who say they know online poker is not rigged are naive beyond description.
Who are those? Links? Pretty sure nobody in this massive thread ever said that.
The great "Poker is rigged" debate - Collected threads edition Quote

      
m