Quote:
Originally Posted by OneOut
I don't think either side has provides solid "proof". It's kind of like religion. Can anybody really ever provide solid proof either way?
All anyone can ever do is post the information they have and provoke thought, intelligent coversation, and more questions.
People who jump in here and say "OMG It's rigged!" and post their Aces getting cracked twice are killing everyone else who wants to have a serious discussion just as those who just call everyone rigtards or shills aren't adding anything constructive either.
Yes to the bolded part. The problem is every idea of how a site can be rigged can be tested statistically to see if it falls within expectation, or deviates too far from it.
The only issue is sample size, but if you don't want to play millions of hands on site x you can just buy them, they are cheap too. Or get them for free for research purposes from some site that datamines for this purpose.
And yes, people have done tests like this without finding anything wrong in the deal. The problem with people that believe it's rigged is they don't want to do the work, and don't know how to do the work. That's where the term rigtards comes from I reckon, they keep shouting something that they could prove but don't even try, just keep shouting.
Look at the level of grammar, sentencing, logic flow of the average 'rigtard' vs the average 'shill' ITT and you'll begin to see why...