...if you don't really know much about programming or math. Oh...

crap...

lol, the closeup is much creepier! I don't look forward to the animated version!

is anyone in this thread willing to review massive hand histories if i send them....particularly tournament play, i am getting to the point where my sample size may be large enough to provide real results...i don't care whether you think its rigged or not, and i'm not saying it is.

anyone?

spadebidder did months ago for a poster named AMEC and after spade did a lot of free work for him all AMEC did was take the results and completely butcher the actual results in terms of meaning and context and then he yelled at spade and others until he got banned both from here and Pokerstars (hmm, conspiracy...)

Odds are you will not find someone else to do your work for free at this point, and why should they. So the only way you will be able to have it done is if you make some significant prop bets based on whatever riggie beliefs you have ( no idea what they are as I missed the past couple of weeks) with escrow. Then they will do the work for you because after you pay $1000+ in prop bets they will not care if you mis-interpret the results however you like to fit your needs.

The other option is to offer to pay someone to do the work, and realize if it comes back as nothing special in terms of whatever beliefs you have that you will not be satisfied.

Save your money and just enjoy your boomswitch, doomswitch, large stacks win too much, small stacks win too much, cash out curse, Lizard People, superbots or whatever riggie beliefs you have if it helps you be comfortable with your results.

Genuine advice.

Watch his current one for 2 minutes for a surprise.

Actually the first animation frame changes occur after 20 secs, (hopefully to hook initial attention) but after that the animated motion is only once every 2 minutes ... hopefully just long enough for anyone who saw the first motion to start to doubt themselves.


.

It's a doll with a bucket o' ice cream on it's head, I don't see what the fuzz is about, how is that scary??

^this is 2+2 where people think its cool to post lame pictures....2006 join date and u didnt know that?

lol, funny thing is kavilla's banned account(s) are probably a 2006 join date..... I guess if he can stay unbanned for the next 4 years he'll be at fault for something

By the way kavilla, it's pretty lol to bash on people for their join dates and post counts when this is the case...

Total Posts
Total Posts: 270
Posts Per Day: 19.06

Because they do not refer to any method that would make sense even if you were trying to rig your site.

Only to idiots.

You probably missed the close-up! the far shot is not so scary!

I was listening to a podcast of a radio poker show. The moderators, 2 male and 1 female, were discussing "ghosting". The final conclusion was that this was not cheating. One factor they used was that you were playing poker and who the opponent was should not matter. To prove their point they also asseted that if you asked the name players in the game today, at least 5%
would admit they had played under someone else's account at least once.
And these idiots think they are promoting poker. No wonder so many people believe on-line poker is crooked. As for ghosting, if you do not consider this cheating, then you must believe there is ABSOLUTELY no skill involved in poker. Making it akin to bingo, and ghosting just passing your dabber to someonse to mark you bingo card.

wait wat

+1

Must be a full moon tonight and they are getting started early.

Was browsing youtube and stumbled on this.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8Whc9...eature=related

This dudes videos are insane!

Your thoughts?

your an idiot

I guess I should start getting the word out to people on yahoo answers.

Yeah, I think you'd fit right in there.

No wonder why you have 7600+ posts. Just keep floating around dropping little turds and grabbing your little cat sized ball sack to amuse yourself...

It's true though. I mean come on if there was anything legitimate about these stupid things people posted on youtube and the made up "former software engineers", don't you think these people would present their info scientifically and blow the cover off of the scandal? People will look to anything to support their viewpoint and treat it as legitimate while ignoring every single scientific approach of attacking a problem.