lol @ rigtards = school children

To a small extent, but not nearly to the extent that you expect. A reaction of "why bother with that rigtard anymore you made your point" would be a bit more accurate. His arguments lose potency after the 100th iteration, not so much credibility.

You are taking an observation (his posting behavior) and applying an assumption to it (he must be a shill), and that is a very flawed form of reasoning.

Take the simpler approach - he replies all the time and fast on the message boards because he is a message board junkie.

All you do when you make up stuff (like the shill comments) is validate that you are willing to happily make stuff up. Believe it or not, people who make stuff up tend to genuinely lack credibility




Or he just finds the topics here more to his interest then the Laughs or Links! forum



Person A goes to the washroom. Person B goes to the washroom and sees Person A. This happens 3 days in a row and Person A says "dude, why are you always in the washroom" implying that something is wrong with Person B.

Yet the world looks the exact same from Person B's perspective about Person A.

All you do is jump into any thread with rigged in it and blindly support any poster that posts anything about it being rigged, even if it is a new poster saying their second cousin heard from a friend that someone is going to expose the industry.

Put simply, you behave in the exact same way as how you describe qpw's behavior. You just have a "not" in front of your opinion vs his. Extremist behavior tends to be similar regardless of the sides they are on about an issue.



Most rigtards tend to be losing players (that the sites seem to not help with their rigging somehow) so it is believable that you are indeed in a state of poverty. You may find your credibility improve if you mak more statements of truth like that and fewer ones based on assumptions in the future.

Hope this helped.

All the best.

And he starts wondering why he bothers.

An intermittent board junkie.

When doing certain tasks that involve sitting in front of the computer and waiting for it do churn through an analysis.

I know I shouldn't but tweaking the tails of rigtards is just so damn amusing.

Which casino do you work for? How much do they pay you to say online poker is rigged?

Do you work for Harrah's? Or Foxwoods? Or the Borgatta?

You reply very quickly SooperFish24 like your getting paid t sit around the forum promoting that online poker is rigged.

Also you only seem to post in the Internet Gambling forum which is a little curious. Like this is your forum for shilling.

Lots of posters think it's rigged but only you seem to be straight into every rigged thread on the other side of the fence. Almost every time I open Internet Poker and there s a rigged thread or the like the last poster is "SooperFish24" surprise surprise.

Seriously get a new account so its harder to spot you.

Epic Fail!

LOL no I dont.

LOl no I dont.

I dont know why Im bothering replying to this nonsense. Ive seen this kind of response before where my OP is just turned around in a laughable way. Like a child in an argument repeating what the other has said in a mocking condesending tone because they have no real comeback.

What are you 5 years old?

Sooperfish, if you were even slightly intelligent you would see that Cry Me A River, far from producing an epic fail, has produced a hilarious satire on the lumpen, childish, styles of yourself and th1133.

You two are making complete fools of yourselves on these threads.

Markusg and qpw could be faulted for being overzealous but other than that they are spot on.

Why do you keep embarrassing yourselves like this?

Some days this thread is kind of fun owning all the rigtards so hard.

But some days this thread tilts the **** out of me because I can't understand how anyone can be that stupid.

tk1133 complaining about colluders at UB as we speak in another thread in the Zoo.

So just to make this clear, one of the biggest rigtards on these forums, plays on one of the only sites that has actually been proven to have cheated the players.

LoL. I play every site. But regaurdless that would inadvertantly show that I actually care about the security of online poker! However you guys make a joke of it. How many people do you think read this and don't respond b/c they know your shills...I was just told by 4 people in emails to stop coming to this site for that reason. But we can't blame the CEO's of this site or the actual people that set this site up for poker players, b/c I'm sure there's little they could do and they probably don't even know. Again this site is for poker players! Not Poker sites!

What have you done to own anybody? You think by belittling people you won the arguement?! QPW basicly admitted he works for a poker site but wouldn't say which one...? So please tell us which sites your employed by, so we can come to some sort of agreement as to why your so bias.

I have no affiliation with any poker site or poker-related business, and I enjoy refuting rigtard logic. I also know some of the other regular posters in these threads are full-time poker players, not site employees. The one known site employee is one who you already said makes posts you respect.

Why am I sensing a joint team effort here? You guys fraternal brothers or what?

I respect your ideas and views as well. You weren't as offensive as the Fraternal brothers...I really didn't have you in mind when I stated that...but back to the war....

I own all the sites and they are all rigged.

/thread

I appreciate that. But I'd point out that calling the most vocal critics shills doesn't help your case, because I doubt any of them are. You are just fanning the flames (perhaps on purpose).

How long is this going to take? It's been over 2 days now.

What? I couldn't hear you over all the tin foil rustling around. Actually a lot of sites have representatives here, it's pretty nice since it gives us sneak peaks of new features and a way to instantly give feedback on ideas they have.

I don't recall you having a problem with the Real Deal Poker CEO posting here.

"YEAH!! Stop using wit and logic you ****ing shills"


No, ur an online poker as a hole. Sorry another typo.

Did anyone say they used a spellcheck or did they just say you needed to use one? Besides, you need to learn the difference between a typo that most people try to eliminate and the repeated examples of your stupidity that you NEED to eliminate.

Really?

Do you actually understand the word proof?

It might if your personal friend would like to admit even knowing you

I reckon you nip horses in the butt. If you cant prove you dont, it's proof that you do. Is that how it works?

Bingo_Boy
journeyman


Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 246 Re: Ask me about doing pretty decent with girls

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Quote:
Originally Posted by kerk
grammar and proper sentence structure ftw!

Quote:
Originally Posted by kerk
the second half of your response im pretty sure is not in english.

Sorry if my sentence was a bit long for you, I just never knew that guys who spend time criticising peoples grammar and punctuation on internet forums got laid so often. Well done!



I see where your coming from....? Haha....Epic Failure

[ ] tk1133 understands how to identify epic failures
[ ] tk1133 is an epic failure
[x] tk1133 is in no way epic, but is absolutely a failure

So now tk's going through people's old posts to copy & paste them into this thread?

Where's that proof you were going to post?

then how would you feel after rationally explaining several times that it was your skill that brought you success but the person making these claims kept insisting their theory was correct, even if they had no evidence to convince you?

Or if that person said the only reason you'd get mad at their annoying behavior was because you were obviously employed by EA Sports or whoever makes that game?

You could see why folks get irked, right?

tk, while I don't think you're Stephen Meares (you could be, but I don't make accusations without proof), you certainly are exhibiting one of his most aggravating traits. You made a statement that seemed to imply you would be coming with some evidence, and then never did. You've been asked about it several times, and AFAIK have never even acknowledged the questions. So what's up?

Clamo, clamatis, omnes clamamus pro glace lactis.

deus beatus googlus

sammiches