Quote:
Originally Posted by DonkoTheClown
After final tabling the last 5 of 8 tournaments live the last couple of weeks, I can see that something is not right with online poker. Whether it is purposefully or not, I just dont need to be wasting much more of my time online. I dont know who or what to believe any longer outside of my own eyes and intuition. It has done me pretty well during my life, so I will just trust myself from now on.
Not sure why you wasted all this time, most of us knew you were just a riggedologist anyway. Now you can join Bucketfoot and others who could not hack it online and whine about it after, blaming everything possible (sites, shills, lizard people) but themselves. The few hands you posted demonstrated why you lose pretty clearly.
You know, if you just play single table SnGs online you will final table a ton of tournaments that way. Wouldn't shock me if a good chunk of the several hundred live final tables you claim to have made (one of the thread's weirdest claims) had 11 people to start or something. Congrats on those final tables...
Anyway, good choice, now you can be one of those live guys who's always moaning about how rigged the online game is at the table. Everyone loves that guy. Seriously.
Quote:
Originally Posted by BucketFoot
Online poker is nothing but rigged set up hands and donks getting lucky.
Completely asinine that these sites are allowed to continue ruining bankrolls as well as lives, when they haven't passed any type of inspection in 5 years.
Anyone with any type of intuition will eventually realize that these sites are bogus.
Some people play for fun so their bankroll being "ruined" is not really an issue. To them it is like spending money on a movie. Many others who play seriously do just fine.
You happen to think you can play seriously but lack the skill to do so, so you lost everything. That's on you, not the evil sites. The best choice you can make in all honesty in terms of EV is never playing again. If whining about conspiracies restores some dignity for you then go for it. You still suck at poker.
Quote:
Originally Posted by obviously.bogus
I'm not a "computer scientist", but I have programmed computer systems in international banks that dealt with billions of dollars a day.
While nobody will ever actually do this, it would be genuinely funny to see a list of all the things various riggedologists have claimed they do in this thread. Literally hundreds have posted and made all sorts of expertise claims and yet not a single one comes close to ever making the sense that spade, pyro, KingofFelt or Josem make with regards to the math/techie issues.
I know how to program the device that records TV shows the rare time I watch, and that's barely, and most of riggedologist self proclaimed experts make even me feel relatively knowledgeable with programming at times after some of the claims they make.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jabbershot
1. The people who were cheating were insiders.
2. There's no meaningful difference between ripped off by insiders at the table and being ripped off by a rigged game.
Although spade politely replied to this fellow, I would actually put this up there as literally one of the dumbest things said in this thread. It's like saying there is no meaningful difference if a bank teller stole money from your account or an entire bank had a system to steal from all of it's customers.
Know what I want for the new year?
- A riggedologist that posts hands from tournaments $20 or more.
- New exciting theories, maybe involving weather patterns or something.
- Spade to post this analysis he is doing already :P
- A riggedologist to show proof that he actually tried to utilize his pattern mapping skills (even if they failed). If you say KK always loses to ace rag all in deep then show me your hands where you charge with 100 BB with A6o knowing you are dominated but will win because of how it is rigged.
All the best.