Evidence?

How about: "tk1133 definatly has sex with children under eight".

See how easy it is to make completely unfounded accusations when you don't bother with evidence?

BTW, have you stopped having sex with sheep yet?

You definately should.

qpw, you're kidding right? When you attack someone's grammar like that, it makes you look just as stupid. And your comment in general is just plain stupid. You should have stopped at "Evidence?"

Luncheon Voucher Gambler, not as stupid as someone who doesn't know the difference between grammar and spelling.

Oh?

Why is that?

If tk1133 can make ridiculous statements without a shred of evidence can you explain simply and clearly why anyone else should not put forward an example to show just how daft making such statements is?

You yourself would have a lot more credibility if you had jumped on the first person to make a libelous statement rather than wait and gripe at someone who merely uses an example of a libelous statement to make a point.

Would you like to put any more nails in your coffin? You're nit picking "for value" when you should be "checking". You're making a point of how stupid these rigtards are and then you go make a stupid ass comment which is immature and totally irrelevant (like your reply to me was). How does this show that you're any different than him? Oh wait.. you were making a point. Right. Ok, I got it. I thought you were just being a dick!

Luncheon Voucher Gambler Just noticed that.. comic genius bro! You're crushing me

I am not a bad poker player, I even won a 1k bounty on Doylesroom, but still think Merge Gaming is rigged, Busted Mike Caro----> SHIP DOUGH boyyy

LV, you are clearly a 'tard fellow traveller.

You're just spouting ad hominens without even attempting to justify yourself.

I'll ask you again (so you can make an idiot of yourself once more by avoiding the question): If tk1133 can make ridiculous statements without a shred of evidence can you explain simply and clearly why anyone else should not put forward an example to show just how daft making such statements is?

Try coming up with an intelligent answer rather than just calling someone names and making statements based on no logical foundation.

Try coming up with an intelligent answer rather than just calling someone names and making statements based on no logical foundation.

My point was that you should try to reply in a manner which isn't immature. The guy misspelled relevant and called you and sb shills. And your genius reply was:

Evidence?

How about: "tk1133 definatly has sex with children under eight".

See how easy it is to make completely unfounded accusations when you don't bother with evidence?

BTW, have you stopped having sex with sheep yet?

You definately should.




Loosen up a bit kid

I think you need to calm down a bit and try and get some kind of perspective.

Then take a deep breath, summon all your powers of English comprehension, and have a go (for the third time of asking ) at answering this question: If tk1133 can make ridiculous statements without a shred of evidence can you explain simply and clearly why anyone else should not put forward an example to show just how daft making such statements is?

Try and avoid highlighting stuff that we have already read because only an idiot is going not going to see that that is just a lame attempt to avoid the question.

C'm on, just try and answer the question.

where do I post my claims that child prostitution is probably going on at your house because it would be easy to keep toddlers in your basement?

I'd be careful what you say or Luncheon Voucher gambler may get his panties in a bunch.

and Chris Moneymaker even won the WSOP.

your point?

I like living on the edge.

Because.. him making a ridiculous, unjustified statement about you does not justify your immature response to him. Just because he called you a shill does not "justify" you saying that he has sex with sheep or 8 year old kids (even if you're doing it jokingly).

You immaturely defended yourself via attacking his spelling mistake (only an immature nerd would do that). I thought I had made that clear, but I guess your grasp of the English language is not as strong as I thought. Now, are you going to repeat your question for the 4th time or should I phrase this response in a clearer, easier to understand way for you?

Bottom line: When going through this thread you are the one who is usually being immature (and irrelevant by consequence). Most of your posts are as immature and aim to be defamatory as the one I'm referring to.

Quit being a keyboard bully. And you're not funny. Really.

qpw (worthless member) Last Activity: Today 04:43 AM
Current Activity: Watching porn with 8 year old kids and sheep.. thinking of something witty to say.

But, you see (and I know the distinction my be a little subtle for you), I was not making a joke, I was giving an example of how absurd it is to make libelous statements without any evidence.

Your hypocrisy in ignoring a genuine and fully, seriously, intended assertion that I and Spadebidder are shills and getting your panties in a bunch and stamping your little foot over a mere demonstration is actually quite amusing.

Nonsense. I just highlighted the correct and incorrect spellings so that the error would not be promulgated by allowing it to stand unmentioned.

I know a few feeble minded types get all het up about that but, again, it's pure hypocrisy because they would never object if someone pointed out that the capital of the US is actually Washington if someone else had said it was Poughkeepsie.

ROFLMAO

Well, you made your opinion clear but I'm really not at all interested in your opinion on that subject. If you like illiteracy to stand that's entirely your own affair.

It looks as if I'll have to because you still have not given an intelligent answer.

Try and understand the question and actually answer it rather than making ad hominem attacks.

If tk1133 can make ridiculous statements without a shred of evidence can you explain simply and clearly why anyone else should not put forward an example to show just how daft making such statements is?

In particular, try and understand the difference between an actual allegation and an example of an allegation.

ROFLMAO!

You really are losing it.

I contend that people who can't spell properly, or at least use spell check, are not clever enough to analyze data for anomalies and their opinions are to be taken with a packet of salt.

Authors of posts full of gross misspellings and outlandish, unsubstantiated claims should be ridiculed on general principle.

LOL.

I notice that you haven't started ranting at Markusg after his similar demonstration of the absurdity of making random claims.

Perhaps you aren't quite so full of yourself when it comes to having a go at a mod?

An allegation in the form of a question. Interesting.

Carry on with your day young man. My bad.

It would be easy to do, so I can't understand why he hasn't, since apparently the prevailing logic is "if an act is simple it is a fait accompli."

LOL, a spelling mistake in copying a spelling mistake.

Well spotted.

I didn't hear Markusg asking anyone if they were still sleeping with sheep. But maybe I just missed it. I wasn't trying to start sht with you either. Not really. I just get sick of your silly, little boy antics and wanted to call you out on that one in particular. But you're a genius. You'll figure that out eventually.

Wow, quite the drama.

Ok, here's the verdict from the voice of reason:

QPW: pointing out the typo was petty, the rest was fine, and perhaps because it was TK: necessary.

LV: when you want to point out that someone is over-reacting, perhaps its better to do it in a manner that could not also be characterized as over-reacting. The point you were trying to make was: when you point out petty things, it detracts from the greater critique.

Friends again?