Quote:
Originally Posted by ibluffoldladies
There are many ways to rig something. It doesn't have to involve a rigged deal which, over a large sample, wouldn't even show anomalies if the "rigged deal" occurred under a certain frequency.
False. Making an unsubstantiated assertion does not make it true. No matter how small the rigging, any deviation from a fair deal
will show up in a large enough sample. The smaller the deviation from a fair deal, the larger the sample must be to distinguish the rigging from randomness, but
any deviation
whatsoever will show up. This is just a mathmatically reality you cannot escape.
Quote:
I make no claims about having proof that online poker is rigged at sites other than UB/AP.
Forget proof, how about the smallest shread of evidence?
Quote:
I really don't. The only thing I'm doing is using logic and reasoning to extrapolate the results we've already seen. When I say results, I don't mean results from UB/AP only. I mean results from ANY industry which is unregulated and involving large sums of money(wall street, old school Las vegas to name a couple).
Wallstreet at any time past or present is just about the most regulated bunch of transactions on the planet. I'm not sure they fit your criteria of an unregulated industry.
And once more, you keep stating that online pokerrooms are unregulated. That is false. You might make the claim they are
underregulated, but that would still be an opinion. But you cannot expect your false "facts" to be stated time and time as support of your position. You cannot base conclusions on false facts. That will not work.
Assumption maskerading as fact. If you have evidence, then provide it. Otherwise you need to phrase it as the belief that it is, such as "I believe the sites are corrupt." As it stands it makes
you not the site out to be the unethical one, because that is slander.
Quote:
It is human and expected. To ingore this would be ******ed, and I use that word because when you people claim others as "rig-tarded", it's actually completely opposite to assume that big money and no regulation = not rigged.
Conclusion based on false facts, unsubstantiated opinion, and conclusions not following from assumptions.
Quote:
We get it though. We know internet poker is your cash cow. I don't blame you for defending it either.
Appeal to motive fallacy.
Quote:
Just treat the people that have legitimate concerns with more respect,
When they do, I do.