The great "Poker is rigged" debate - Collected threads edition
10-08-2009
, 06:27 PM
Can you explain the best way to put them together then? Do you have to export then import back? Cos obviously I still want them in hem afterwards. 
10-08-2009
, 06:28 PM
10-08-2009
, 06:31 PM
I have poker tracker, under database management there is an option to export your hands, it shouldn't affect your base database at all. It doesn't remove them. I'm sure HEM has a similar function.
10-08-2009
, 06:33 PM
Quote:
Why is it that riggedologists are never good at spelling and grammar? Is it just that they are so excited they type faster than they can think? I'm picturing spittle spray on the screen, loud banging on the keys, yelling while posting..... must be a good gif for this somewhere.
10-08-2009
, 06:36 PM
) is incorrect about "also have", "their's", "that we can go" HAHAHAHA, and the position of those commas?
10-08-2009
, 06:43 PM
10-08-2009
, 06:45 PM
Ye that's more like what I'm driving you lot to, I'm perfectly calm lmao. Stars is rigged and I've proven it wooooooo. Go me
10-08-2009
, 06:48 PM
Quote:
Beside a couple of obvious typos and slang which only extremely pathetic people who can't get laid would point out, would you care to explain wot (<<<< yes deliberately misspelled cos I fkn can ) is incorrect about "also have", "their's", "that we can go" HAHAHAHA, and the position of those commas?
) is incorrect about "also have", "their's", "that we can go" HAHAHAHA, and the position of those commas?
I didn't point out the rest of the ones you're asking about, and I don't really feel like wasting even more time on it, so I'll let spade explain them if he cares to. Like I said, I don't usually bother, but you asked.
And I'll ask you again, should I take your lack of response to mean you are retracting your lie that every single hand at Poker Stars results in a straight or flush?
Oh look, another lie!
10-08-2009
, 06:53 PM
10-08-2009
, 07:05 PM
If the guy denied the accusation then he must have done it!! pmsl nice logic there. So their's should just be theirs? That's about all you've taught me, thanks tho. Tho. Tho. Like it? Cooool
10-08-2009
, 07:11 PM
You're confusing yourself now. I haven't commented on your grammar. As for the rest of the above post...wat?
10-08-2009
, 09:19 PM
10-08-2009
, 10:58 PM
10-08-2009
, 11:04 PM
Quote:
In the real world the owners of any large company tend to pretty much ignore the fringe conspiracy guys (whether this guy is genuine or not does not matter). Frankly, I am kind of surprised that Josem responds to many of these guys. Not really sure what he ever hopes to accomplish and it seems like an exercise in futility from a business standpoint, since riggedologist/conspiracy nuts tend to drag down any conversation, which is another reason most large companies ignore them (and Michael Moore...)
I participate here in my own time, and certainly am not paid by PokerStars to discuss this stuff here. You could probably map how I spend my time by the timings of my posts.
I post here for the same reasons that everyone else participates in this thread. I find it interesting and a little enjoyable. I find the issues involved fascinating.
In my own time, I also am involved in a bit of politics stuff and other activities that probably don't make a huge difference to making the world a better place.
Quote:
Your perception of how a large company would behave seems a bit off Donko if you think most even care about real or fake paranoid extremists (whatever their issue is). Site owners don't care about riggedologists, the stuff we see here does not even come close to the completely insane stuff they get via email anyway.
10-09-2009
, 03:27 AM
Quote:
10-09-2009
, 05:22 AM
10-09-2009
, 05:55 AM
Quote:
This conversation is really bizarre, because I think either me or you guys are missing something fundamental.
But one doesn't inspect or verify the RNG by physically standing there and looking at it. I don't understand why you would think that having physical access is even relevant here: it's not.
This is not a car factory where you can see the wheel getting attached to the axel, and the axel to the suspension. The RNG is taking place inside a computer.
Let's say that you ran a random number generator on your home PC. How would you verify it? Certainly not by just standing there and looking at the electrons move around the PC. You'd verify it by taking the results and doing some statistical analysis. Not only is that the only way to actually check the thing, it means having 24/7 physical access to the PC is irrelevant: you only need to look at the end logs and review that.
Well, the idea that some guy looking at a screen 24/7 is relevant here is really weird in my mind. Not only would that probably be the world's most boring job, it'd also be pretty ineffective.
But one doesn't inspect or verify the RNG by physically standing there and looking at it. I don't understand why you would think that having physical access is even relevant here: it's not.
This is not a car factory where you can see the wheel getting attached to the axel, and the axel to the suspension. The RNG is taking place inside a computer.
Let's say that you ran a random number generator on your home PC. How would you verify it? Certainly not by just standing there and looking at the electrons move around the PC. You'd verify it by taking the results and doing some statistical analysis. Not only is that the only way to actually check the thing, it means having 24/7 physical access to the PC is irrelevant: you only need to look at the end logs and review that.
Well, the idea that some guy looking at a screen 24/7 is relevant here is really weird in my mind. Not only would that probably be the world's most boring job, it'd also be pretty ineffective.
