Quote:
Originally Posted by tk1133
Thats why you and a few others get called shills. Your have no desire or ambition to help anybody or anything. You dont have the mindset and attitude of a Poker Customer, but that of a Customer service rep....Same people saying insulting people over and over virtually out of nowhere...
These shills as you call them, would make pretty poor customer service reps, with all the insulting and all.
I know my point of view, with my small number of posts and all, spread out over three years, means little to a robust poster such as yourself, but I think if you have read this thread and remember every post in it (as I know you want the rest of us to do) there are many many posts describing how to start analyzing your own stats with a view to seeing if they fit within the statistical mean. You have several posters offering to help any such enterprising players.
How many rigtards have actually done and rigourous analysis? How many have done more than notice trends while they play, get sucked out on (mostly in tournaments) and coming up with a "feeling" that something is wrong.
All the times wrongdoing has been found on 2+2, it has been the result of rigourous analysis by ordinary users. They have found something suspicious, investigated it, compared notes, and submitted their findings to the general public for further analysis.
Most rigtards get stuck at step 1: finding something suspicious. They never get to step 2, but yet they expect to have the dramatic results that the more rigourous investigations lead to. What should the rational response to such methodology be?