It's just as standard, meaning it happens just as often.

And you didn't answer my other question.

EDIT: And this, pay up $5M:

I have a nagging belief that not all Stars tournaments are 100% legit, 100% of the time.
Like I've stated in this thread before, I and others are going through my stats to look for patterns etc.

I'm just gonna continue to play and try to get better, if they have to steal a little of my thunder now and then so be it...

BTW, you're gonna get in trouble posting all those HH's here.

Interesting how you left out the hands that left you with such crippled stacks. Couldn't be because you played bad, could it? I mean, you'd definitely post if they were "bad beats" and yet they aren't here. Hmmmm. And you obviously lost hands as the bigger stack, seeing as you're still in the tournaments. Impressive minraise war on the flop. Would you have posted this if the turn was a 4? This is so hilariously standard it's kind of funny you posted it. Your M was around 3 and villain had a massive chiplead. You got it in as a slight favorite and lost. You got it in as a dog and lost. Bummer. A coinflip, how very exciting. Wow, pretty much the same coinflip only this time you're the slight dog.

Otatop, you just don't get it. He was trying to play bad. It's the only way to take advantage of the rigged RNG. LDO

lol, R4R is so pathetic. He's not even trying, nor is he interested in trying. He makes a post saying the hands all happened consecutively, and yet the times are all over the map. A bunch of those hands are effectively coinflips. It's as if he has the expectation that he's supposed to win as a 60% favorite 90% of the time, and if he doesn't it's rigged. Not to mention he obviously left out all of his winning hands that held up according to his skewed expectations.

Oh, and he showed us how bad he is at poker, and that he apparently expects something other than an all in fest in the super turbos where those 60/40 all ins are going to happen constantly with mediocre hands.

I was just deep in a pokerstars tournament right before the money and some guy takes a minute to call my all in after the turn. The card gives him a gutshot. Not sure why he called my pre flop raise with q10 os. There was no other hand or draw possible to beat him. I am sitting totally burned and watching the dead bodies pile up and I kid you not, in less than 60 seconds, another 75 players busted.

They are juicing these tournaments to get them done faster, it is so obvious without even looking at hands...just sit and watch sometime after being miraculously busted by a 4 outer. I give up...over and out...

Geezabalou, analyzing hand histories shore is hurd. So is lernin muh game better. Oh look, that guy has a naggin' feelin' that pokerstars be rigged. Heck, so do I. 'Nuff said. Over and out!

LOL! GENIUS!

So obvious, in fact, that when you do look at the hands, you can't even tell! These ****ers are good.

Please explain how they do this "juicing". Then see post 7222 and also post 4187 for some examples of how easy it would be to detect any manipulation of the community cards. The first example shows flops, but I've created similar tests for turns and rivers too.

I didn't even look at any other hands except for what I got knocked out of the tournaments with, numb nuts. And I didn't intend to prove online poker is rigged by posting 10 HH im simply showing why I do not win on OP as these type of things consistently happen to me. Im not a bad player whatsoever.

Also - this is all in one day.

So you got incredibly short stacked in at least 7 tournaments because the sites are rigged against your amazingly good play?

Hm... well if the sites did manipulate the cards wouldn't that be the intent? And if you notice most of my hh are when its down to the final 2 people which means that i am ITM.

Yesterday, right after my deposit I also got a royal flush and a straight flush in a matter of 200 hands. Please, math guys - tell me the odds of that?


Here is my royal, btw:

http://cakepoker.com/en/HandHistory/...TNxYjFxcPHzMHF

These two statements together seem to be a logical fallacy.

LOL! Good approach. Biased sample much?


Wrong

Pretty irrelevant when you consider the fact that you never told us how many hands you play in a day. I've seen people play 10k hands in a day. Also - you weren't a big favorite on most of your posted hands.

You still haven't responded to below, and you still haven't answered why you deposited in the first place if you don't play. Pay up my $5M or prove you don't owe it.

The isle of man does not do anything to supervise/regulate online poker.

According to Pokerstars and the Isle of Man government website, that is false. I PMed Josem, so maybe he can add additional insight. But feel free to check it out yourself (not that you will): here and here. At the Isle of Man website, be sure to check out the Legislation section.

When can I expect my $5M back? I'm dead serious.

'

Please don't just send me to their website, I already know their deal. They claim to regulate/supervise online poker yet they do not do so. If they had done so, the UB and AP problem would have never happened.


Bernie Madoff's auditers also claimed to be doing their jobs.. Catch my drift?

To make you lose specifically? Whose sister to you **** years ago to piss off all the sites? So it's just rigged against you winning, then? Maybe you just *gasp* suck at HU. That hand where your opponent has an almost 9 to 1 chiplead on you kind of makes that seem possible.

Wat. Feel free to point out where on UB or AP's site it says they're regulated by IoM.

Well not me personally. Each person is targeted though.. It's called a program. Its not some guy sitting behind a desk pressing buttons, imo

my mistake. KGC. even still, Isle of man has still shown no proof of their "consistent" regulation.

Then you would know, as it shows here, that UB and AP aren't regulated by them. I didn't claim they regulated all of online poker. You said they don't do anything to regulate online poker. Clearly, they do.
That governments and other regulatory establishments are useless? Is that your point?

And you still haven't answered when you're going to pay me my $5M, you scammer.

I think you are confusing the Isle of Man with the Kahnawake. The IOM have nothing to do with the AP/UB issue. It just sounds like you've got the names mixed up there.

The Isle of Man regulators are appointed by an independent, democratically elected government.

Their regulatory regime was approved by the UK - the same review process that declined to recognise the Kahnawake as legitimate.

Here's a press release on the issue:

http://www.culture.gov.uk/reference_...ases/2261.aspx

And a comment from the relevant UK Secretary of State at the time:

I think that's wrong.

I think that the endorsement by the UK Minister on the issue is very strong evidence of their credibility.

Also, from the link above: