LOL..it is only to keep the those that I don't know out of it.

If he was banned before, why not just ban him again if it is the same person.

He still seems kind of boring to me, but then I never quite got what the fuss was about the first time around with him. Just a routine zealot with a weird cause (as zealots go)

We can't ban him just when he's about to post all his evidence!

I hope we get more hand scribbled, unverified cashout curse graphs

has anyone seen or heard anything about some Senior Management of Pokerstars that goes by "dave" closing accounts for emailing too much about chat or city fields? I have 2 close associates that have told me about it and the site has SEIZED their funds and have said they will not give them back. I believe it's time these sites should be subject to legislation so our government can stick up for us.

I didn't read any of the posts ITT but I'll cash out everything I have in Stars immediately! Thanks OP!

all joking aside i hate stars and i hope it gets aids

http://podcast.wjfk.com/wjfk2/1673740.mp3

mediocre poker radio interview with paco hope from cigital.....

end thread.

fyp

still waiting for the other shoe to drop.

ive heard its not the size of the shill but how you use it

this doesn't count as one of the 2-300 folks posting in this thread to express their concern about the state of online poker.

You're confusing shills with penises.

Or maybe I am, who knows.

maybe he meant roosters?

rofl I'm sure you'll find someone who will argue it's rigged in the opposite way.

QPW:


Obviously, man.. Jesus.

Once again let me clarify it for you:

WHAT DO YOU CONSIDER EVIDENCE?

Can you speak up a bit?

Erm, evidence, you say?

Well, that would be some credible, verifiable, data that indicates that what you keep asserting may have some actual basis in fact.

The instant that you provide that you can sit back and relax whilst SpadeBidder, myself and doubtless a good half a dozen others produce the code necessary to expose the whole sorry, sordid, scheme.

Of course, that assumes that there IS such a scheme in the first place.

QPW, I don't mean to stoop down to your level, but you're the type of person I'd like to throw off a bridge.

Every response you give makes me laugh. Like this:

You just defined the term evidence - what are you an idiot? STOP avoiding the question that I asked, I see you doing this a lot. Your responses tend to purposely merge off-topic and then you end with a smiley face and act like it's all good. I see right through you my man.

http://suicidehotlines.com/

They might hopefully be able to help with your homicidal feelings as well.

An interesting new meaning of the word stoop of which I was not previously aware.

Sadly, often the response of the intellectually feeble when they are unable to properly express themselves even using the many hundreds of thousands of words that make up the English language.

Well, that's nice, at least.

You seemed to be struggling with it.

Well, I'm not the one who need the term 'evidence' defined for him.

I answered the question you asked!

What an interesting use of language.

You do realise that 'merge' is a transitive verb rather than an intransitive' one, don't you?

I only ask because you have used it intransitively in the quote above and hence it doesn't make any sense. (Unfortunately, continuing a trend that is easily discerned within your posts. )


Have a nice day!

qpw, you missed two responses to your quotes to put emoticons in.

QPW, you got picked on a lot in highschool, didn't you?

Does anyone else here see what this guy does?? He just responds to anything and everything with whatever he can come up with. Obviously he knows what I meant when I said "evidence" but he tip-toes over it because he doesn't have an answer for it. What a joke.. That's the last response you get from me QPW, you are a tool

There's no point in over-egging the custard.