Lets try to get bak to the rational chat in here.
There are two good and simple and obvious way to rig the game, one is to change the EV of given cards so they win less fequent than expected and by that generates more rake for the poker room, keeping players playing longer.
This theory has some potentials flaws, like spadebidder pointed out, but I havent seen the math supporting those flaws nor have seen the database analisys showing there is no statistical significant deviation from the expected EV at any point of the game wih any cards analysed, so the EV change theory is still alive.
The other very simple and intuitive theory is the "site owns ot theory". This theory is eve more easy to be put i practice and even more difficult to be detected. It says the site has bots playing for them.
Notice that in this theory there is no need to change the EV of any cards. Also, there is no need to change the normal randomness of the shuffle.
I cant see no big flaws in the bots theory, if yu see please share.
By the way, I pay poker online and I´ve been winning for 3 years. So my doubts about tfairness of the business has nothing to do with my profits or unprofits.