Quote:
Originally Posted by Markusgc
The part you're missing here is the players that need the help the most will still manage to make tragic decisions and lose the hand regardless of how much the site rigs it in their favor.
As far as the "it cannot be detect" (sic) part, well you haven't detected me in you bedroom with your wife yet, have you?
I didnt missed that, I said exactly that few posts ago. The rig model does not intend to favor this or that player neither cares who wins the hand or not, what the rigged system cares is to keep the money more time in the table. This is how it works:
1. The rigged software makes the favorite hand win less frequent than it would be expected. But note (this is very important) the favorite hand stills wins most of it, indeed almost in the right frequency.
That leads tothe conclusion that even if that software is running the better player will win money in the long run and the bad player will lose.
Note one important point, there is no sense in simply revert the equity of two hands playing HU. Theres no sense in making AA win 20% against 88. That would give no extra benefit for the poker room.
The ideal scenario for a poker room is that every hand played had 50% of equity, that would generate the maximum amount of rake possible.
Obviously they cant make that, because if they did no one would be profit and it would be easy to know something was wrong, so they try to aproximate the equities the more they can in the direction of that ideal 50%.In the previous example lets say, making AA win 60% against 88.