OK, as spacebidder is running deep hh analyzis, i want him to analyze percentage of draws completing vs AA, perecentage of all pp holding up vs AK and provide them in % of each of it. I dont know why but i have the feeling after hundreds of thousands of hands that i have played there that JJ helds way more against AK and AQ than pp like 99. Thats it. Even if it is not any sort of prove, but this atleast can be veryfied.

Why is it when you have AA KK and someone shoves on you, you start getting nervous instead of salivating? Because your 80% is more like 63% if that.

aa < kk
kk < 99
aa < 99
aa < 10 8

last four games. Chances of that.... way less than 1%.

I'm sure i'll get them next time.


EDIT :

No my next hands

AQ < A10

Then

Kx

flop kk9

dude has 89, I lose.

Chance of that all in a row, go play the lottery but this every day. You still defend this? Get away with you.

Because without proof, it's all meaningless conspiracy theories.

If their opinion is online poker is rigged and they dont have anything other then their thoughts to back it up, then its not ridiculing someone to point that out.

this isn't bad advice for new posters or first time rigged posters but it's kind of asking a lot if it's a reg rigged poster.

You are losing money by posting here.

Why do you all ask for proof when more then one site has been found to be taking peoples monies dishonestly.
As a good poker player you must think on multiple levels and even maybe in your day job too so to think it could not happen is niave at best and as for clear explanations
being dismissed as shilling some of theses shills just cannot exept that this can and has happened.Ie people losing money due to a sites intergretity that has been comprimised at some level.

K13

This deserves to be ridiculed.

Although PokErasmus is giving you a run for your money, I still think you are, by far, the worst poster in this thread.

As I mentioned before, you're looking for this forum:Beats, Brags, and Variance

If it's so "****en" rigged there WHY DO YOU KEEP PLAYING THERE??? Go back to your favourite site with the ****ty customer service and super users if you're so unhappy at Stars.

And what imaginary word do you keep typing that comes out ****en? You mean ****ing? Or ****in'?

Are you going to answer this?

No worries i'm a rec low limit slum dog. This is the first hobby that has ever paid me as long as i make some money it's all good.

I am kind of lost in that quoting stuff sorry.

You said :
I know it would, because you believe:


PokerErasmus : In poker any combination of hands is legitimate and must be seen as random.



You said :So I can write software that gives me AA every hand, and that's random. Cool!



So what i said is " In poker any combination of hands is legitimate and must be seen as random." Is what you believe, not him. Becouse it is the way you see it, and you blindelly ask for proof from anyone who says that its otherwise.

Cool. So, you cant win $, you have around 1500 posts, and you are just mixing up into a "crew". Thats cool I understand.

My point was that since he believes "any combination of hands is legitimate and must be seen as random", I could write software that gave me AA every hand and that, by his definition, would be "legitimate and must be seen as random". Did my logic fail me somewhere?

If i couldn't win i wouldn't play.

I dont know what this means.

Correct but i beleive he refers to an alorithm that is programmed by man to be random.And as this may not be regulated..well.

Yes, if you write such software, sign 30 pros (29 of whom is brake even or even losing players after monster sample sizes). Your hats and shirts are all over the biggest live events you invest millons in advertisements, it will become random. You can make algorithm witch doesnt necesarily will deal AA 12 times in a row or whats so ever, your deal will become random over view of thousands of people.
From other point of view, you can have a legitimate buisiness (random) hire same ammount of pros (witch will show the same bad results) Invest the same ammount of money in advertisements and there still will be players who claim that your deal is not random.

This games involves such huge ammount of variance, you just cant prove anything. Even 1000 expamples of 20K coinflips will have around 3% of samples with 75% heads or tails.

You don´t have/need to.

It's hard to read some of this, but I have no idea what any of it has to do with my point.

How many samples of 100% heads?

non i guess ...

Oh i get it now. You think i want to be apart of some anti rigged crew and thats my motivation for being here.

You are incorrect sir, i just think it is scummy to call sites cheats without proof. Plus conspiracy theories always intrigue me.

LOL is FTP truley legitimate or are there numerous shell companys affiliated to this site does and then the question is who is responsible for regulating what.Or maybe you put some of your servers in a country and apply for gamming licience then open afflilates and change company names once in a while to further the trail but who is regulating this multimillion dollar company.

Screen name please? I wanna watch this stuff in action. Seems like you are Stars' favorite target.

Stars is one of little sites i trust. Stars, Entraction, Party.

Who cares .. Ivey plays there for millons so it can´t be rigged.

Is this admission that K13 is your gimmick account?

Why is that ? The reason why i dislike many other sites is becouse : Cake, iPoker, Boss - Software. Full Tilt - I don´t trust them.