Sorry, I may be responsible for this when i suggested his time would be better spent posting hand histories to improve his game. In my defence, I did mean somewhere else but I should have known I needed to make this clearer

standard. try the STT Forum or BBV - just gtfo here.

that's what you get when you give a rigtard the benefit of the doubt. you've probably learned your lesson. him, I wouldn't bet on it.

Actually, paleantologists now believe that the brachiosaurus didnt keep its head elevated like that, but low to the ground kind of dragging it around.

the picture of the doushe was ****** hilarious!

and jesus hated dinosaurs he was deathly afraid of them, and would scream like a little girl every time he saw even a little one.

anybody ever heard of the theory that when u play more aggressive
and just plain extremely aggressive in FT and PS u get better hands

all of my friends and I have been playing for a long time on both sites
and while u can't proove it.it sure seems like it sometimes

any thoughts?

i agree for one that the algo for random hands on these sites comes up
with things that in live games u only rarely see

mark how long did that take you?

I thought that before as well, but then i noticed. Than when you play more agressivly, u actually do get more playable hands becouse you play more hands. You starting hand requirements for open raising are way smaller then if you would be playing TAG game. And a hand like 89s becomes a raisable hand in late position. And when in between those hands you get cards like AK, AQ KK etc, its not becouse you get them more often - Its becouse you play more hands, and your not so bored. :P And you will also get your good hands payed off more oftenly. And also after raising hands like J10s QJs, Suited conectors and almost any 2 from late position, hands like A10 KQs looks like nuts.

Yes, that theory has been said before.

So has the theory that aggressive play leads to worse hands (to punish aggressive players who tend to be better then passive fish)

Odds are that both theories are equally valid.

Do you now how RNGs algorithms are programmed i suggest looking this up.
Thats why some people play the software rather than poker because after x amount of time on any given site you start to see patterns not mapping but patterns(this has been studied at numerous universities) so calling that river card is not as David Blaine as it seems.(i will leave out the maths and model at this time).

You're referring to pseudo-random number generators, which haven't been used by poker sites in years. The "true RNG" systems they now use are the most random thing that humans are capable of generating. There are no studies that have shown predictable patterns in modern RNG's; that's either made up or just plain imagination.

The tired old "patterns" theory again. You would enjoy the research of Stephen Meares.

Look it up........ but you already know...as i said numerous studies have been done on algorithms and poker goin into the luck vs skill debate which is lending weight to goverment legislation.

LOL, fairtards

Let me add tell me how meny possable combinations fron a 52 card deck?
Your 12 tabling ok 6 table min your playing for 4 hrs max.
You are not going to see the same algorithm RIGHT?
What about when you run into bad beats that combined add to a lottery win.
Varience?

Riddle me that spacebidder.

hilarious level imo.

but do you have any evidence?

Your my favorite poster shhhhhhhhhh.

gj markus, nice pictures.

i just looked at 1/4 millions tourney lobby and it says that there where 27600 entrants when tourney started and now after little over 4h playing there are left less than 400 entrants. do you really believe that it's possible to drop 27200 players in 4h without "spicing" up board or adding setup hands? Yes, online poker = more hands, no doubt. But 27200 in 4 hours, it's seems kinda... are you kidding me?

Amen brother....only some are chosen to see the light....

u mean the sun second chance? The more likely explanation is that you cant read.

Yeah, it has nothing to do with the fact that the blinds go up fairly fast meaning that most people are in the red zone before the second break. Even now the chip average is at the bottom of the orange zone.

fast blind structure ? average stack 16bb ? So .. I dont agree with that.

If you ever played in that you would realize that apparently J9 vs 22 vs 106 suited all in preflop for 75 BBs is a setup hand.

That was not even the craziest hand I saw at my table either.


No kidding, but a semi turbo + a crazy payout structure + a ton of people in it via satellites who play in their mind for free = a lot of eliminations fast.

You are free to have your "something must be up" beliefs all you like, but there are probably better ones then this that can at least appear more rational, and odds are you "feel" that about all sorts of thing you fail to fully understand.

Use better rigged theory selection.

All the best.

Your choice.

Obviously you haven't looked into the structure of the tournament, or you would see how FOS you are.

Rigtards: Before coming here to make a half-a**ed attempt at your theory, do some research, or maybe add two numbers together on your calculator, so it's not blatantly obvious that you have no proof to back up your claims.