Quote:
Originally Posted by BucketFoot
Except you were playing holdem where you are only dealt 2 cards.
Increasing the number to 4 makes this extremely unlikely.
The fact that villain ended with the nuts both times is the kicker though.
Unlikely, sure. Impossible - of course not.
You kind of said what the issue was without intention, basically you losing two hands. That tends to set off all sorts of paranoid thoughts in some, and thus a new rigged theory is born.
The other day I lost 6 off 6 all ins heads up vs an opponent in a sit and go. 1 coin flip, 2 hands like AJ vs KQ, and 3 times when I was dominating. He kept apologizing and I jokingly said it would be nice if he was the favorite at least once.
These things happen and they stand out when they do, but to leap to "RNG rigged" is a huge step that does not actually match the logic of the scenario.
- It requires the RnG to be rigged against YOU. That seems a bit much.
- It implies that any time a couple similar hands are dealt in the same time period that proves it is rigged. That's silly. Had you won either hand or if they were dealt an hour apart you probably would not notice as much.
You are doing what a lot of conspiracy guys do, taking unrelated bits of data and creating a grand unification theory. Reality tends to be simpler
- Odd sequence of 2 hands dealt which was only noticed because you vastly overplayed your basically one way hand each time
And scooper, you still have yet to comment on the rigged beliefs that sites help the short stacks in tournaments. One of the guys who posted a rambling manifesto the other day basically suggested that a few times.
Is that rigged theory valid? Yes or no. Odd how you continue to ignore this simple question.