Full Tilt Matrix SNGs...WOW...holy sick beats - Page 2 - Internet Poker

Your sample size of 5 sngs is conclusive proof of rigging. Thanks OP. I'm gonna pull off all my money on ftp now and put it on a less rigged site. Which one do you suggest?

Quote

11-24-2008 , 02:07 AM

#27

SHANAX

centurion

Join Date: Nov 2007 Posts: 100

Coincidence that was the FIRST HAND I played since I got the email from support when I said I thought things were shady on these SNGs....hmmmm... You are all right though, offshore online poker is 100% legit....no cheating, scams, ripoffs, etc...have ever been found.... yep.

Quote

11-24-2008 , 02:31 AM

#28

Tappy Tibbons

adept

Join Date: Feb 2006 Posts: 889

Don't blame Full Tilt. I offered you the red pill, but you saw those pocket aces and you chose blue.

Quote

11-24-2008 , 02:42 AM

#29

aoFrantic

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Apr 2007 Posts: 25,221

Or maybe you should just play SNGs where the payout structure isnt awful?

People run 10x worse then this, as they run this bad over a sample that somewhat means something.

Quote

11-24-2008 , 12:31 PM

#30

Markusgc

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Feb 2006 Posts: 8,788

Quote:

Hand 1:
A

= 87% (win) .23% (tie)
K

= 13% (win) .23% (tie)

So about a 1/8 chance of losing. Not much worse than the roll of a die, right?

Quote:

Hand 2:
A

= 81.5% (win) .19% (tie)
K

= 18.5% (win) .19% (tie)

This one is about 1/6. So are you saying that if you picked a number between 1-6 and someone rolled it you'd be convinced of witchcraft?

Quote:

Originally Posted by aoFrantic

Or maybe you should just play SNGs where the payout structure isnt awful?

People run 10x worse then this, as they run this bad over a sample that somewhat means something.

this fella's got it right.