Quote:
Originally Posted by ak7062
You missed the point entirely. Taking such action would net FTP absolutely nothing, while simultaneously destroying its reputation. Your suggestion was completely absurd.
I guess "survival" is a relative term then. This is a terrible analogy. If the object of FTP is go from the #2 site in the world to a low-trafficked, nefarious room, and thus, "survive", then I suppose you are right.
Never, ever, ever would happen. As long as Full Tilt keeps offering the 2nd largest guarantees on the internet, and maintaining the second highest traffic, no one will give a ****. "Low-trafficked nefarious room?" ****ing ha.
#3 site: "Ultimate Bet. Where some opponents, who aren't nearly as stupid about it as the ones we caught, can easily probably see your cards."
Full Tilt: "Where, if you cheat us out of money, you risk having us expose your identity." Wow, they stress following the rules. What *******s!
If you think that all gamblers are like yourself, and apply logic to bankroll management and online poker, you just don't know **** about human beings and their propensity to gamble.
In the run-up to BF, it was getting harder and harder to withdraw from PokerStars OR Full Tilt, and yet traffic kept going up on both sites. It makes no logical sense.... but it's not about logic. People like to gamble. Most of them lose, so they don't give a **** about withdrawing. They don't give a **** about the integrity of the site. They just want to play.
Why the **** are people still playing now? Why are they still depositing? Because they cannot stop. They never can stop. That's what kept the business running after the UIGEA, and that's what's going to keep it going now.