Collusion on GGPoker? - Internet Poker

Two Plus Two Forums Online Poker Sites & Marketplaces Online Poker Sites Discussion of Poker Sites

Collusion on GGPoker?

Post Reply Subscribe

...

07-28-2020 , 05:20 PM

viking1

adept

Join Date: Jan 2011 Posts: 910

I am amazed what happened in this WSOP freeroll tonight for invited players.

Top 2 get tickets, and top 3 were all Canadians. After an incredible run from all 3 players , on the bubble, they went all-in with the worst hands possible, even if only top 2 got paid. Why? They work together for sure.

A Sharkscope search reveals they are all new players from Canada, only playing this freeroll , to make sure the rest of us get nothing. Very strange behaviour. What are the odds for that?

And no history from all of them, new players only for the freerolls WTF ?

[/url]
[url=https://ibb.co/mbFk4Hk]

Quote

07-28-2020 , 05:32 PM

a dewd

Pooh-Bah

Join Date: May 2016 Posts: 4,594

Working together...always possible

GG using housebots/superusers....ridiculous and on wrong side of rigtard stuff.

New players from Canada? Most likely US player, crossed the border to play in the game.

Quote

07-28-2020 , 05:43 PM

viking1

adept

Join Date: Jan 2011 Posts: 910

I wonder if they will actually play the $150 Million, maybe even win it.

Quote

07-28-2020 , 08:01 PM

pmarrsouth

Pooh-Bah

Join Date: Oct 2007 Posts: 4,123

Quote:

Originally Posted by viking1

I wonder if they will actually play the $150 Million, maybe even win it.

They might read the forums, but just in case not, report it to their security team. They can look into it from a collusion type aspect

Quote

07-28-2020 , 08:08 PM

Bobo Fett

Carpe Diem

Join Date: May 2006 Posts: 57,260

OP, what inspired you to use a thread title for which you had not a shred of evidence in your post? You've been around here long enough to know what "housebot" and "superuser" mean, haven't you?

I'm assuming what you actually mean is "house account", but even that doesn't make a lot of sense. Why do they need a house account to expose itself by winning a freeroll, rather than simply granting it entry to the tournament itself?

Quote

07-29-2020 , 04:54 AM

smartDFS

veteran

Join Date: Feb 2015 Posts: 2,204

this is irrefutable evidence GGPoker has deployed canadian housebots in freerolls

also, another good example of Betteridge's law

Quote

07-29-2020 , 07:59 AM

viking1

adept

Join Date: Jan 2011 Posts: 910

Sorry I was frustrated yesterday because they ran so good.

You can change the title of the thread to Collusìon between 3 Canadian players .

Quote

07-29-2020 , 09:41 AM

M07

grinder

Join Date: Dec 2008 Posts: 604

Quote:

Originally Posted by a dewd

Working together...always possible

GG using housebots/superusers....ridiculous and on wrong side of rigtard stuff.

New players from Canada? Most likely US player, crossed the border to play in the game.

Not ridiculous at all. It's happened and proven before with Pitbull Poker.

https://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/2...rusers-540094/

Quote

07-29-2020 , 03:00 PM

Bobo Fett

Carpe Diem

Join Date: May 2006 Posts: 57,260

Quote:

Originally Posted by M07

Not ridiculous at all. It's happened and proven before with Pitbull Poker.

https://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/2...rusers-540094/

A much better example would be Cereus, where superusers actually were proven, unlike Pitbull where there were very strong suspicions but never any proof that I can recall (I don't believe hand histories were available there).

That said, "housebots" weren't part of the conversation on either site. That would be a tough thing to prove.

None of this, though, changes the fact that OP provided zero proof of either housebots or superusers, and has since walked that back and is sticking to the collusion part of his OP. I would imagine this lack of proof was why a dewd said it was ridiculous - not because it isn't possible.

Quote

07-30-2020 , 10:06 PM

#10

mr.effoff

journeyman

Join Date: Sep 2014 Posts: 353

you lost me at freeroll

Quote

Post Reply Subscribe

...