Quote:
Originally Posted by bigt2k4
I was just wondering since we never even knew we were dealing with Tusk- it is was not in the T&C to my belief, I think we might have legal recourse against Microgaming and Microgaming subsequently has legal recourse against Tusk. Is this the case? Could we sue Microgaming and Microgaming would legally be entitled to sue Tusk, but since there wouldn't be any money left Micro would be left to eat the loss- this is down the line of course, but it could be possible?
Also, most judges would be very sympathetic to our case because of how the whole thing went down, they do not like companies ripping off people and may interpret or even read in to current statutes just to get us our money and show how they will not tolerate any form of white collar "crime".
Yeah I've been wondering where we stand with regards to not even knowing we were dealing with Tusk alright.
As far as I was concerned my money was going into Battlefield and they were responsible for it, had no idea there was a third party (other than MGS possibly) active who were dealing with player balances. No mention of it when signing up, depositing etc.
How did you/your dad/lawyer get on with regards to finding out the structure of the company? You mentioned previously that he thought that it was illegal for a company of such structure (presumed) to not hold player balances in trust, any news on that?