Quote:
Originally Posted by Trailer
My recap of this is probably not exact...
That's an understatement. If people want Cliffs Notes, they should read the
Cliffs Notes instead of the above. They were reasonably good. The only major thing that's happened since they were written is that a liquidator has been appointed.
Some particularly egregious errors in the above:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Trailer
This statement says that they are awaiting word from Tusk and appointing a liquidator. Then after a week, with no word from anyone at all, we get the message from Microgaming. "We have appointed a liquidator".
Microgaming can't appoint a liquidator. They neither own Tusk, nor are they the Vanuatu court system. Tusk announced they were liquidating, then MG pulled the plug on their poker room and casinos. More recently, MG said that they've heard from Tusk that a liquidator was appointed.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Trailer
Especially with so many clients, and probably 2-3-4 companies like Tusk to handle the money...
Tusk ran a cardroom and some casinos, they weren't just a company that "handled the money." They are one of about 46 Microgaming poker licensees. The only thing unique about Tusk was that they sold branded versions of their cardroom to people like Battlefield, RedNines, etc.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Trailer
How come Tusk has all the money, why doesn't the money go into a account that Microgaming has complete control over?
Microgaming's a software provider. If you want a software provider and poker room all in one, there are plenty of independent cardrooms: PokerStars, Full Tilt, Absolute, etc.
Last edited by Self Made; 03-08-2008 at 06:11 PM.