Quote:
Originally Posted by TheMegsDregs
Sweet. NoteCaddy will still be working exactly the same as before for me. Is this the end of Richas and co complaining?
No.
I want the regulators to enforce and I want third party s/w suppliers to be licenced, to have them actively declare that they are running to clients so that we can have choice between sites based upon what s/w they allow.
Me I want some sites to be able to have full on bells and whistles HUDs with add ons galore, some that set rules like these and some that ban them either for all tables or some. CHOICE.
FYI I think NoteCaddy is a powerful and potentially useful tool for recs as well as regs - OK I peronally hate all the add ons but that's not the same as wanting a universal ban, I want CHOICE and full disclosure by the sites, by the suppliers and to other players - telling them that thei opponents are running XYZ software.
Oh yeah then we have the need to police data mining - again deliverable by regulating HUD suppliers.
Oh yeah, seat scripts and the lovely Spin Wiz collusion aid, these rules don't mention that at all.
I don't expect to run out of stuff to moan about any time soon, a bit of progress on third party software rules at two sites is nice but there are still bots, collusion and other cheating issues unfair currency charges, firms stealing money from dormant accounts, how firms (don't) compensate cheated players, diclosure on cheating events, the way that B2B firms escape responsibility for player fund protection and social responsibility .
By the time that is sorted there will likely be some new tax thing or something else.