Quote:
Quote:
How is that possible?
With 2x 20" you have 3200x1200
With 1x 30" you have 2580x1600
This is more 220 pixels with the 2x 20".
Assuming those resolutions are correct, and without resizing a typical 800 x 600 table, they will indeed both take 8 tables and no more. I'm not sure where you get 220 pixels from; you will actually have an extra 288,000 pixels with the 30" table, in a rather useless (at least for poker tables) 180 x 1600 strip when you turn the 30" sideways.
How can they both take 8 tables whithout resizing? Only the 2x 20" can.
2x 20"
1600x1200 = 2 row of 2 tables = 4 tables (800x600 table)
1600x1200 = 2 row of 2 tables = 4 tables (800x600 table)
1x 30"
2580x1600 = 2 rows of 3 tables = 6 tables
To someone who only want the monitor to play poker, 6/8 tables, what's the best option? Im incline to say 2x 20", but i don't know... yet. But overall (DVD, internet, games,etc) i guess 30" is better.
And btw, how can you have more pixels in 1x 30"?
30" = 2580x1600 max resolution
20" = 1600x1200
2x 20" side by side = 3200x1200