Quote:
Originally Posted by pig4bill
V2 isn't calling V4's raise, he's trying to "square up" V3's action by putting in one small bet.
This is the way I see it:
OP is first to act. When the floor rolls back action to him, HE is the one who changed the action by betting. After that, everyone is free to do what they want. Floor got it right as far as I can tell.
P.S. OP needs to learn what the definition of "check raise" is.
I don't see how I could have possibly been the one who changed the action. I also don't know what V1 did if not a check raise. To recap:
OP (in seat 1 UTG): checks
V1 (in seat 3): checks
V2 (in seat 5): doesn't act
V3 (in seat 6): bets
V4 (in seat 7) attempts to raise; v2 then immediately attempts to put a single bet in
Floor rules that V4 cannot raise but is calling a single bet. (After mistakenly first looking to V1 for action), Floor then looks to OP for action, and OP calls the bet. V1 then raises. Floor then rules that V1 changed the action which permits V2 and V3 to pull back their bets.