Quote:
Originally Posted by Freewill2112
^^^ This is usually where the Table Professor pipes up, "Actually, every gambling event is an independent entity, the result of which..." How much he manages to get out depends on how swift someone is with the KITN.
The (bad) strategy talk at a table is one of the most tilting things ever. From another (the pet peeves) thread:
The painful strategy (and rules) talk from "experts" who feel the need to prove how much they know to the whole table (it's usually at least 3 or 4 people at a full ring low stakes table). it's a surefire way to tell that they are just a really bad reg. The quickest way in fact:
and:
Someone that seems (claims?) to know how to play ABC, but really can't, and still is way too loose preflop who criticizes your play.
I back-raise jammed to isolate a 4bb shove with a bounty in a multiway limped pot with 78s and the others' folded and I won.
They all tutted and rolled their eyes and made a ton of comments.
One player - "I folded 8s!"
Me - "LOL, no way"
"I did!"
Also the next morning I had to deal with a self-proclaimed expert on my direct left who had 2 friends playing in their first ever poker tournament and they were clearly looking up to him as some sort of mentor. I felt bad for them actually because they clearly thought he was good and were looking for some advice, but he was godawful.
Flatting a raise with QTs off of 9bb then folding to a jam, open limping QJo from EP off of like 15bb, etc etc etc. Standard awful tournament plays which he explained to his team.
One of those guys that feels the need to demonstrate how much he knows to prove a point. First thing he did was ask the dealer if the betting line played at The Borgata when he sat down. ****ing LOL.
When I busted (I defended A9ss and check-jammed the K Q 7ss flop only to get snapppppppppppped by 79hh and he held) had to deal with a lot of analysis on my hand from that guy too. I told his friends on the way out to perhaps look to other sources of poker knowledge if they want to get good.