Quote:
Originally Posted by pineapple888
Without taking sides about Mizrachi's skill level, this "accomplishment" in a vacuum means close to nothing i.e. it doesn't "prove" that the player in question is skillful. It's just a couple of data points.
Many of us have been asking that question for a long time.
That said, I didn't notice anything clearly LOL about Mizrachi's play as I was watching (whatever on specific hands above, I'm not going to debate them in a vacuum), and I agree that judging a player's skill level from a few hands is a dubious task.
Cool. I think we're in agreement here.
Regarding Mizrachi's Player's Championship title and November Ninering, I would say both, though just a "couple of data points," are self-evidently not in a vacuum when put into the context of his career. I understand what you mean though, in the sense that a coin flipped, no matter how many times it was flipped previously, still has a 50% chance of being heads or tails. And even if Mizrachi were the most skillful player in Poker, his probability would be .000009% of accomplishing what he did, as opposed to .0000003% for the the average population. In other words, he ran better than way good this WSOP.
These sobering realities in mind, I still applaud an established pro, with proven success as a tournament player, winning the Player's Championship, which has a structure about as good as one could hope for in terms of rewarding skillful play; that he made the November Nine the same WSOP year is astonishingly improbable, but also reassuring if we are trying to argue to our girlfriends, parents, and government that tournament Poker is, in fact, a skill game.