Quote:
Originally Posted by Rapini
This is real life in the US. Your post was read and understood as someone on the outside looking in. You probably don't know that the vast majority of people in tipped positions--waitstaff for example--are not paid the federally mandated minimum wage, which supposedly is the minimum someone could live on. Therefore their salaries are NOT figured into overhead, etc., like you said in your original post.
You can pretend all you want that you're under no ethical obligation to tip, but it doesn't change the obligation.
Then that's a major cop-out by business US-wide, and like I said earlier, a genius solution to cutting costs. I'd be happy to tip, if they work for tips only, but it's this idea that it's almost as if the business subsidizes their own employees' earnings that I have a problem with. Either pay your employees what the market value of their labour dictates, or tell them they can't pay them and that they're welcome to work on tips only. Then let the service person decide if those working terms are acceptable.
This half-ass, inbetween compromise is bull****, and I won't apologize for not playing along. Call me stingy or cheap if you like, but the name calling won't mean anything other than an attempt to guilt-trip and potentially ostracize the non-tipping party into conforming and contributing to the custom.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rapini
The slippery slope doesn't really work here, as your post demonstrates. No one is saying there should be a rule or law requiring tipping a certain amount, tipping in certain situations, or even tipping at all. What I said is that there is an ethical obligation to tip in these situations.
This is what I take big issue with. To say that somebody is acting unethically, that alone is enough to warrant that the viewpoint you're supporting is correct by virtue of it being ethical. Problem is, you have to argue and show how it is ethical. The only argument that's been made so far is something along the lines of, "you're not paying for a service that's provided to you."
What's wrong about this particular argument is that there is no contract on the terms of the service. It's not agreed upon prior to the service being provided. If we agree beforehand on terms (no, walking into a restaurant and sitting down/being seated is not an implicit agreement into this tipping contract), and then I break those terms, I've done something unethical. I'd have to renege on my word or cheat/deceive the other party somehow for it to be unethical - the action of reneging or deceiving itself is what's unethical. So you need to show how not tipping becomes unethical. You can't just say it's wrong, if I haven't actually wronged anyone.
Some places include a service charge on the bill and the service person tells you upfront or there's a sign or note in the menu. That's sometimes saying, "tip included in your bill." It doesn't matter much to me as a customer whether that service charge goes to the owner or to the server, since I'm still getting squeezed for that extra cash. You can clarify, then tip anyway, if it makes you feel better. It doesn't make it ethical to do so, or unethical not to do so in this case.