Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
Player has 3 cards, correct ruling? Player has 3 cards, correct ruling?

11-11-2017 , 07:52 PM
Preflop action is a raise from EP, 3 calls.

Flop checks round.

Turn goes check, check, check, bet, villain in blinds folds, as he folds it turns out he has 3 cards, which he did not notice until folding because two of the cards were stuck together (according to him).

What is a standard ruling here? Situation ended up with 2 floor staff, hand continues (standard ofc) and villain gets his money back out of the pot (which I question).
Player has 3 cards, correct ruling? Quote
11-11-2017 , 08:14 PM
"Standard" would be play continues and Monte does not get his money back out of the pot.
Player has 3 cards, correct ruling? Quote
11-11-2017 , 08:24 PM
Standard is his hand is dead and he gets no refunds. Player is responsible for ensuring he has the proper number of cards for the game.

About the only unusual thing that should happen here is that floor should consider whether player was actively cheating and needs to be 86ed or worse. In general, probably not, cards do stick together sometimes. But if there is any suspicion they might call surveillance and have them take a look.
Player has 3 cards, correct ruling? Quote
11-11-2017 , 08:29 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by dinesh
cards do stick together sometimes.
And not notice until he folds on the turn? Cheating scumbag if you ask me.
Player has 3 cards, correct ruling? Quote
11-11-2017 , 08:36 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by steamraise
And not notice until he folds on the turn? Cheating scumbag if you ask me.
Yes?

If I don't notice at the time I am originally checking my cards, then the next possible time I will notice is when I am folding or showing them down, because they are sitting there underneath a chip protector motionless otherwise.
Player has 3 cards, correct ruling? Quote
11-11-2017 , 09:54 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by dinesh
If I don't notice at the time I am originally checking my cards...
Stuck cards usually come apart as soon as you touch them. Almost for sure when you bend them to peek.
And how could you not notice the thickness?
Player has 3 cards, correct ruling? Quote
11-11-2017 , 10:32 PM
Standard ruling is hand plays on and no refunds. Dealer checks the deck after the hand for extra/missing cards.
Player has 3 cards, correct ruling? Quote
11-12-2017 , 12:51 AM
+1 to dead hand/no refund
Player has 3 cards, correct ruling? Quote
11-12-2017 , 03:07 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by steamraise
Stuck cards usually come apart as soon as you touch them. Almost for sure when you bend them to peek.
Some are vacuum-sealed together practically. I remember pulling down a board to show the cards used for a player's winning hand and exposing a second card behind the turn card. I peeled that card off the top of the deck and turned it over and never realized there were 2 cards.

Quote:
And how could you not notice the thickness?
Card thickness isn't the same between cards. Or maybe they are but feel slightly different in thickness as I pitch them.
Player has 3 cards, correct ruling? Quote
11-12-2017 , 10:13 AM
No money back. Can't see why this was done. Maybe he had some kind of "special" relationship IDK.

I think some players (few) might actually not notice for lots of reasons. Holding on to 3 cards intentionally doesn't seem to me to be a good move most of the time.
Player has 3 cards, correct ruling? Quote
11-12-2017 , 12:10 PM
The only fair thing to do is give each of the remaining players a third card.
Player has 3 cards, correct ruling? Quote
11-12-2017 , 06:00 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by psandman
The only fair thing to do is give each of the remaining players a third card.
Poker would be so much fun if we had more floors like you
Player has 3 cards, correct ruling? Quote
11-12-2017 , 08:45 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by psandman
The only fair thing to do is give each of the remaining players a third card.
Reverse Pineapple. Interesting idea.
Player has 3 cards, correct ruling? Quote
11-12-2017 , 09:41 PM
I think a cheating scumbag could have figured out a way to fold without revealing that he had 3 cards.
Player has 3 cards, correct ruling? Quote
11-12-2017 , 10:24 PM
He wants them to see the three cards as he says "OMG I didn't even notice". And gets his money back.
Player has 3 cards, correct ruling? Quote
11-12-2017 , 10:56 PM
someone cheating would make sure all three cards got into the muck without them splitting apart.

hand plays no one gets money back.
Player has 3 cards, correct ruling? Quote
11-12-2017 , 10:58 PM
More cards than you should have after action = dead hand, no refund. Maybe circumstances warrant more.

I could imagine not noticing that I had 3 cards, assuming 2 were stuck together. I'd hope that I wouldn't be punished as a cheat, at least not the first time

No, I'm not asking for a refund.
Player has 3 cards, correct ruling? Quote
11-13-2017 , 02:13 AM
OK thanks for the replies everyone, seems pretty definitive that the floor I deal with is mentally challenged.
Player has 3 cards, correct ruling? Quote
11-13-2017 , 07:15 PM
probably dont come from a poker backround so dont know what the right rulings are when its not in the book.
Player has 3 cards, correct ruling? Quote
11-13-2017 , 08:53 PM
There's a book?
Player has 3 cards, correct ruling? Quote
11-13-2017 , 11:04 PM
yes
Player has 3 cards, correct ruling? Quote
11-14-2017 , 12:37 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by steamraise
There's a book?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ray Zee
yes
There are lots of books .. thus threads with 100+ comments ... GL
Player has 3 cards, correct ruling? Quote

      
m