Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
NEW Poker After Dark, Weeks of Aug. 1 and 8 (100k Cash Game) NEW Poker After Dark, Weeks of Aug. 1 and 8 (100k Cash Game)
View Poll Results: Who will win the most money over the next 2 weeks on Poker After Dark - $100,000 Cash Game
Michael Mizrachi
10 8.13%
Phil Hellmuth
19 15.45%
Mike Matusow
6 4.88%
Peter Jetten
52 42.28%
Chris Ferguson
5 4.07%
Brandon Adams
19 15.45%
Jean-Robert Bellande
12 9.76%

08-10-2011 , 06:52 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by lawdude
Having criticized the QQ play (it was awful), I will say this:

There is one defensible thing about the trapping strategy. It does minimize the losses you face on scary boards. (Indeed, Hellmuth may really be making a MUBSy play, not a trap here.)

Compare this QQ hand to the infamous Brandon Adams hand where he had TT.

In the QQ hand, he limp-called, and folded when an ace came out. It cost him a few thousand dollars.

In the TT hand, he raised and re-raised pre-flop, got called, and folded when an overcard came out. It cost him a lot more.

The thing is, it is extremely common that you raise with QQ, get called or 3-bet, and then a king or an ace or both hit and you end up having to puke-fold and lose a big pot, or c-bet into someone who turns out to have you crushed.

What Hellmuth, I guess, is really trying to do is preserve his ability to cheaply fold to scare cards. If the board runs out right, he can set his trap and milk the other player for some chips. If the board runs out wrong, he can get away from his hand and it doesn't cost him much.

The problem with this play is that he is giving up all the advantages of aggression and the ability to win any big pots with his hands. He's giving up the high reward because he doesn't like the high risk.
If he is looking for a reason to check fold scary boards when he doesn't have the initiative, he is playing the weak-tight, losing strategy we give him credit for. He is out of position there and he really isn't going to extract too much value with the best hand considering that any decent size move he makes at the pot with an overpair overrepresents his hand. I hate the limp call preflop, but his turn fold is actually a good one. It is kind of sad how he just baits people to ask him what he had so he can brag about how he folded a huge hand.

With regard to the TT vs. T7 hand. He keeps referring to it like he took some kind of bad beat there. I don't remember the preflop action, but he put in a lot with TT and then check folded a Q high board or something. Hard to argue for a bad beat(or a good read) when you fold the best hand on the flop facing one bet. He always talks about how people are playing so fast and how is setting them up. All that ever happens is folds the best hand or takes a stand and pays off a lot with the worst hand.
NEW Poker After Dark, Weeks of Aug. 1 and 8 (100k Cash Game) Quote
08-10-2011 , 07:52 PM
the way PH played that QQ hand was just downright pathetic
NEW Poker After Dark, Weeks of Aug. 1 and 8 (100k Cash Game) Quote
08-10-2011 , 08:09 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by JasonP530
If he is looking for a reason to check fold scary boards when he doesn't have the initiative, he is playing the weak-tight, losing strategy we give him credit for. He is out of position there and he really isn't going to extract too much value with the best hand considering that any decent size move he makes at the pot with an overpair overrepresents his hand. I hate the limp call preflop, but his turn fold is actually a good one. It is kind of sad how he just baits people to ask him what he had so he can brag about how he folded a huge hand.

With regard to the TT vs. T7 hand. He keeps referring to it like he took some kind of bad beat there. I don't remember the preflop action, but he put in a lot with TT and then check folded a Q high board or something. Hard to argue for a bad beat(or a good read) when you fold the best hand on the flop facing one bet. He always talks about how people are playing so fast and how is setting them up. All that ever happens is folds the best hand or takes a stand and pays off a lot with the worst hand.
I think he is playing bad weak-tight poker and is trying to brag about his "big laydowns" (indeed, this ties in with JRB's "how much did you lose in the hand?" comment-- he's making "big laydowns" for very little money).

And I think you are perceptive about position. Indeed, I'm no expert on NL strategy (I play mostly limit) but it seems to me that it's A LOT better to slowplay one of these hands in position than it is out of it. That both gives you the ability to get a better read before making a hero fold AND to be able to milk more chips out of your opponent when your "trap" works.

Out of position, you really need to bet your hand if you are going to play it at all.

With respect to the TT vs. T7 hand, I think, in the end, he made the elementary mistake of calling a huge bet without a plan for the rest of the hand. If your read is "this guy is FOS", you can't really flat tens after a 5-bet because there are so many scare cards. You can flat aces or kings, but not tens. So it's much better to just shove pre-. If your read is wrong and he's got aces or kings, OK, you lose, but it's actually OK to lose because your read is wrong.

What's bad with Hellmuth's line is that he's refusing to take a decisive action. If your read is that he's got it, fold. If your read is that he doesn't have it, shove. There's really no in between with pocket tens.
NEW Poker After Dark, Weeks of Aug. 1 and 8 (100k Cash Game) Quote
08-10-2011 , 08:17 PM
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz zzzzz

this is still on?

5 nits and a douchebag
NEW Poker After Dark, Weeks of Aug. 1 and 8 (100k Cash Game) Quote
08-10-2011 , 09:17 PM
PAD sucks. Show one hand, show an ad, show 2 hands, show an ad...

The best thing about PAD is Leeann Tweeden and the Papa Johns ad. But i still find myself watching it hoping for some action.
NEW Poker After Dark, Weeks of Aug. 1 and 8 (100k Cash Game) Quote
08-10-2011 , 11:14 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by AhPhukit
PAD sucks. Show one hand, show an ad, show 2 hands, show an ad...

The best thing about PAD is Leeann Tweeden and the Papa Johns ad. But i still find myself watching it hoping for some action.
Leeann eating papa johns, imo.
NEW Poker After Dark, Weeks of Aug. 1 and 8 (100k Cash Game) Quote
08-10-2011 , 11:16 PM
jfc it annoys me so much with how nitty Ferguson plays. He's ****ing folding KJ and 64s to just opening raises, in position, with 100x the bet behind. WTF!
NEW Poker After Dark, Weeks of Aug. 1 and 8 (100k Cash Game) Quote
08-11-2011 , 02:11 AM
How many times can Phil bring up the hand 5 months ago with Adams?
10,10 vs. 10, 7

The answer, at least 6 times an F-ing show
NEW Poker After Dark, Weeks of Aug. 1 and 8 (100k Cash Game) Quote
08-11-2011 , 02:28 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by RNauta
I think on shows like these they're playing for 10% of what is shown on TV. Buy in for 10K to get 100K in chips and act like it's a lot of money for them.

If you look at Peter Jetten's tournament stats in 2008 he came second for that WSOP bracelet he mentioned on the show for 528K and later in 2008 350K in a high roller. Since then he won 320K in jan 2010 at aussie millions and 170K at the 2010 WSOP, since then almost nothing (a 45K euro payout in a 25K euro buyin tournament looks nice but is just a mincash). In between are a list of small cashes which probably barely pay for the travel and hotel expenses, not to mention he has living expenses as well and probably plays those events staked so big wins aren't 100% his. He only won 120K total for the whole of 2009.
A guy like that who despite being a good tournament poker player is financially barely managing just isn't going to blow 100K for entertainment purposes. Matusow and Bellande are also unlikely to play for a full 100K, even if it's 10K they have to get staked for that amount.
[ ] has heard of cash games
NEW Poker After Dark, Weeks of Aug. 1 and 8 (100k Cash Game) Quote
08-11-2011 , 02:35 AM
Does anyone else get more pleasure than Phil folding big hands?
NEW Poker After Dark, Weeks of Aug. 1 and 8 (100k Cash Game) Quote
08-11-2011 , 03:02 AM
Did Mike just lay down QQ to a three bet ...
NEW Poker After Dark, Weeks of Aug. 1 and 8 (100k Cash Game) Quote
08-11-2011 , 03:06 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by templeross
Did Mike just lay down QQ to a three bet ...
And then correctly call out Mizrachi's hand as well?
NEW Poker After Dark, Weeks of Aug. 1 and 8 (100k Cash Game) Quote
08-11-2011 , 03:26 AM
And Adams raising to like $1,600 with AQ and folding to Chris' re-raise to like $4,000
(Chris with A,9)

Seems nit-a-licous
NEW Poker After Dark, Weeks of Aug. 1 and 8 (100k Cash Game) Quote
08-11-2011 , 04:17 AM
At least Mike won when he had the Ace burgers........
NEW Poker After Dark, Weeks of Aug. 1 and 8 (100k Cash Game) Quote
08-11-2011 , 05:12 AM
"king salmon" is some ish, Ali has officially lost the plot.
NEW Poker After Dark, Weeks of Aug. 1 and 8 (100k Cash Game) Quote
08-11-2011 , 05:15 AM
That was a good laydown by mike matusow. I wish they would have rabbit hunted.
NEW Poker After Dark, Weeks of Aug. 1 and 8 (100k Cash Game) Quote
08-11-2011 , 05:35 AM
That's one of the strongest folds in the history of tv poker.
NEW Poker After Dark, Weeks of Aug. 1 and 8 (100k Cash Game) Quote
08-11-2011 , 06:41 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by gummy d
That's one of the strongest folds in the history of tv poker.
Mike always makes amazing folds so that one didn't surprise me at all. Here are a few other excellent lay downs by Mike:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=viAbXmPRu_M
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6SXz5IPdji8
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VsjelwcsOCw
He also folded King high flush to Ivey on Million Dollar Cash Game, Ivey was done with the hand, Mike value bet and got check raised huge.

Moral of the story: When you fold %90 of your nut type hands, you will correctly fold QQ vs the biggest nit of poker, Ferguson, that holds AA - without trying to flop a set lol.
NEW Poker After Dark, Weeks of Aug. 1 and 8 (100k Cash Game) Quote
08-11-2011 , 06:44 AM
Very few interesting hands these past two weeks,it's been an all out nitfest from the get go with running commentary from Matusow.

Not good.
NEW Poker After Dark, Weeks of Aug. 1 and 8 (100k Cash Game) Quote
08-11-2011 , 07:47 AM
I actually was gonna come here and say that Mike is playing some good poker with the 3betting instead of coming over the top. Then I saw the QQ-hand and I'm not sure what to think about that. *thinking*. I'm not sure what to think about that.
NEW Poker After Dark, Weeks of Aug. 1 and 8 (100k Cash Game) Quote
08-11-2011 , 08:51 AM
The highlight so far was Ali's comment about Matasow "Steam Limping", that's about it
NEW Poker After Dark, Weeks of Aug. 1 and 8 (100k Cash Game) Quote
08-11-2011 , 08:59 AM
lol nitweekaments
NEW Poker After Dark, Weeks of Aug. 1 and 8 (100k Cash Game) Quote
08-11-2011 , 09:01 AM
Some guy just folded QQ face up to a 3bet and Hellmuth gets it allin preflop with him next episode. Makes no sense. LOL

I bet Hellmuth has 10/10 at best next episode. I'm guessing AK.

GUESS HELLMUTH'S ALLIN HAND!!
NEW Poker After Dark, Weeks of Aug. 1 and 8 (100k Cash Game) Quote
08-11-2011 , 09:47 AM
I really don't see why everyone is bitching, this has been some very well played poker (minus the way Hellmuth played QQ.
Spoiler:
Mike's soul reading fold of QQ vs Ferguson was astounding and I guess Mike has kings in the hand against Hellmuth. Not sure what Hellmuth has.
NEW Poker After Dark, Weeks of Aug. 1 and 8 (100k Cash Game) Quote
08-11-2011 , 09:54 AM
Also, has anyone noticed how symmetrical the poll is?
NEW Poker After Dark, Weeks of Aug. 1 and 8 (100k Cash Game) Quote

      
m