Quote:
Originally Posted by Fore
As to what you will accept. I did not imply anything. You stated you will accept a flashed card per down to get five more hands per down. No imply by me. On the other errors I clearly asked if you were willing to accept them. Again I implied nothing. I asked
Are you actually this obtuse or just pretending?
All questions come with implied assumptions. Let me demonstrate:
Do you still enjoy having sex with sheep?
Do you still enjoy watching little boys shower?
We're you dropped on your head as a child?
I am not implying anything. I am just asking.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fore
But since you will accept those flashed cards error, why won’t you accept the other dealer errors?
This has already been answered in this thread and should be obvious anyway. Exposed cards on a deal are easily correctable and do not affect the game in any meaningful way. Misreading boards and over-raking pots obviously has a negative effect on the game and might not be correctable.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fore
good dealers won’t make those errors at those rates but sloppy ones trying to go faster than they can will make all of those errors at an unacceptable rate.
Agreed, but it still misses the point.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fore
As to the dichotomy, your premise was very much just that. This has been confirmed as that by others. My claim it is false is my claim but I stand behind it.
Still missing the point of the comparison. Maybe you weren't pretending...........
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fore
Less than five minutes of a down is spent pitching twenty hands by a good dealer. To get to 25 from 20 by only pitching faster you would have to spend about 15 seconds pitching all 25 hands. And that doesn’t even include the time each down spent correcting and showing the table the flashed card. Thus your clearly stated dichotomy is demonstrably false.
I bet you when those theoretical conversations came up about who would you rather sleep with? Jennifer Aniston, Courtney Cox, or Lisa Kudrow, it all went over your head and you kept asking why Jennifer Aniston would sleep with a $1-$3 poker player.
For the record, here are all of the details of the comparison conversation. After a card was exposed on the pitch, a player asked why the dealers didn't deal like they do at high end baccarat games where the players handle the cards (or apparently like some rare European poker games), where the dealer would deal all of the hands right in front of himself and then slide them out to each player. There is almost no chance of exposing a card using this method.
It was explained that using that method was rather slow. So even if you took the slowest, sloppiest dealer pitching cards (one who accidentally exposed one card a down) it would still be preferable to the slow baccarat method to most players. That is where the numbers came from. Take the worst sloppy dealer you know of and compare him to a dealer using the baccarat method. Which would you prefer?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fore
You tried to make a claim. When I show how bad your assumptions were you whine and claim I am dishonest (btw, the correct term would have been disengenuous). Grow up and accept you made a claim which you cannot support or get support for.
Your obtuseness implies nothing about my maturity.
But it is nice to laugh at. Good luck.
BTW, the correct answer is Jennifer Aniston, even knowing she would never sleep with a $1-$3 poker player.