Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
Do spectators have an obligation to call out misread hands? Do spectators have an obligation to call out misread hands?

02-23-2018 , 08:07 PM
For instance if one hand beats another, but the player with the losing hand is going to get the pot and no one notices except a spectator, should the spectator speak up?
Do spectators have an obligation to call out misread hands? Quote
02-23-2018 , 08:16 PM
Must? No. Should or Can? Sure.

Either way, if he does, I wouldn't complain.
Do spectators have an obligation to call out misread hands? Quote
02-23-2018 , 08:44 PM
My own morals would compel me too, in spirit if the fairness and integrity of the game.
Do spectators have an obligation to call out misread hands? Quote
02-23-2018 , 09:11 PM
I am going to say no. The reason I say no is simply which is more likely, that a spectator saw something that all the people involved missed, or the spectator is mistaken about what he saw. Note: this doesn't apply if you are a floor person that can make the dealer stop what they are doing before the evidence of what you see is gone.
Do spectators have an obligation to call out misread hands? Quote
02-23-2018 , 09:17 PM
what happened to '...if you see something, say something...'

All that is required for evil to prosper is for good people to do nothing.
Do spectators have an obligation to call out misread hands? Quote
02-23-2018 , 09:19 PM
Why not? But if she's wrong she's gonna look like a fool :O
Do spectators have an obligation to call out misread hands? Quote
02-23-2018 , 10:02 PM
If hands are tabled, yes obviously. If not stfu.
Do spectators have an obligation to call out misread hands? Quote
02-23-2018 , 10:48 PM
The question is confusing. Many agree that a seated player ought to speak up but OP might be talking about someone rail-birding the game in which case NO!
Do spectators have an obligation to call out misread hands? Quote
02-24-2018 , 12:11 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Eclipse14
If hands are tabled, yes obviously. If not stfu.
+1

Sent from my LGMS631 using Tapatalk
Do spectators have an obligation to call out misread hands? Quote
02-24-2018 , 05:05 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by RR
I am going to say no. The reason I say no is simply which is more likely, that a spectator saw something that all the people involved missed, or the spectator is mistaken about what he saw. Note: this doesn't apply if you are a floor person that can make the dealer stop what they are doing before the evidence of what you see is gone.
+1 on this and I'll go against the majority of the people in this thread. If you're sitting at the table, speak up whether you're in the hand or not. If you're sitting on the rail, keep your mouth shut.
Do spectators have an obligation to call out misread hands? Quote
02-24-2018 , 09:57 AM
I think OP meant someone not seated at the table. It's not the worst thing , but it really could be awkward. I would avoid doing that personally.
Do spectators have an obligation to call out misread hands? Quote
02-24-2018 , 12:55 PM
The false positives are a small cost imo. Yeah it's annoying, but the exceptions make it worthwhile.

Also, while the population as a whole might have a low rate of accuracy, individuals are polarized. There are your backseat driver types who always need to be involved, and then there are those who use discretion and speak up only when something feels off. The latter group will be right more often than not.
Do spectators have an obligation to call out misread hands? Quote
02-24-2018 , 12:58 PM
I have been the only person at the table before who caught a mistake. Maybe you have too. And so you can imagine that an entire table might make a mistake while you are just spectating, which has also happened to me. If I were at the table, I'd want someone like you or me to speak up!
Do spectators have an obligation to call out misread hands? Quote
02-24-2018 , 01:19 PM
Did OP mean people on the rail or players in the game but not in the hand? The former should stfu and the latter should speak up imo.

Sent from my LGMS631 using Tapatalk
Do spectators have an obligation to call out misread hands? Quote
02-24-2018 , 02:22 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Howard Beale
The question is confusing. Many agree that a seated player ought to speak up but OP might be talking about someone rail-birding the game in which case NO!
Question not really confusing to me. Answer is still yes. Game integrity. I agree likelihood of a passer byer actually being right is slim. But them speaking up to see that the best hand wins is good for the game. Now if can’t be confirmed impound pot and check the cameras. Also work on procedures.
Do spectators have an obligation to call out misread hands? Quote
02-24-2018 , 02:26 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lordkjun
Did OP mean people on the rail or players in the game but not in the hand? The former should stfu and the latter should speak up imo.

Sent from my LGMS631 using Tapatalk
Everyone. Even non players not only can but should speak up to correct an error. Best tabled hand should win regardless of who has to point out it is the best hand.
Do spectators have an obligation to call out misread hands? Quote
02-24-2018 , 03:45 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fore
Everyone. Even non players not only can but should speak up to correct an error. Best tabled hand should win regardless of who has to point out it is the best hand.
I guess we're just gonna disagree. I can respect you're view, but I feel that other than the floor, you're either in the game or you're not.

Sent from my LGMS631 using Tapatalk
Do spectators have an obligation to call out misread hands? Quote
02-24-2018 , 04:43 PM
The others who disagree are at least sharing their reasoning. Not much value coming in here and being like “stfu, okay bye”.
Do spectators have an obligation to call out misread hands? Quote
02-24-2018 , 04:45 PM
Spectators don't have an obligation to do anything.
Do spectators have an obligation to call out misread hands? Quote
02-24-2018 , 04:47 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by albedoa
The others who disagree are at least sharing their reasoning. Not much value coming in here and being like “stfu, okay bye”.
Is that directed at me? I shared my reasoning. You're in the game, you play it and protect the integrity of it. Those on the rail have no skin in the game and should stick to observing it and not attempt to influence it.

Sent from my LGMS631 using Tapatalk
Do spectators have an obligation to call out misread hands? Quote
02-24-2018 , 04:50 PM
Influence it? If everyone playing the game has an interest in upholding its integrity, why wouldn’t they want an observer to speak up?
Do spectators have an obligation to call out misread hands? Quote
02-24-2018 , 04:54 PM
If you don’t see a difference between your “reasoning” of “because” and others who are explaining “because why” then yeah we’ll have to agree to disagree.
Do spectators have an obligation to call out misread hands? Quote
02-24-2018 , 04:54 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by albedoa
Influence it? If everyone playing the game has an interest in upholding its integrity, why wouldn’t they want an observer to speak up?
Because the 10 seats wife, the drunk guy in the 7 seats friend and the passer by are not in the game. It's no different than a fan in the stands yelling at a ref at a basketball game because he thinks there was a foul. Those involved in the game are the one's who have a responsibility....spectators do not.


Sent from my LGMS631 using Tapatalk
Do spectators have an obligation to call out misread hands? Quote
02-24-2018 , 05:09 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lordkjun
Those involved in the game are the one's who have a responsibility....spectators do not.
While this is true, there's nothing wrong with spectators doing so.
Do spectators have an obligation to call out misread hands? Quote
02-24-2018 , 05:13 PM
I'm not upset if they do....I'm just stating my opinion to the question that was asking for the internet's opinion.

Sent from my LGMS631 using Tapatalk
Do spectators have an obligation to call out misread hands? Quote

      
m