Quote:
Originally Posted by poskid
I've never understood card protectors. The likelihood of your hand being declared dead without significant negligence on your own part is tiny even if you don't place a chip on them. If you're worried about it a chip suffices without your "good luck" charm.
So, card protectors do serve several purposes, and not all apply to all players. First and foremost, they, well, protect your cards. Sure, you could use a chip, or your hand, but you could also use a card protector.
Second, they can be interesting. Live poker can be a slog, and if someone has a good conversation starter as a card protector, this can be a welcome addition to the game. Also, since poker is all about managing your table image, a card protector can be used to add to that image.
Finally, they are, as you say, 'good luck'. And no, it is highly unlikely that a card protector actually alters the distribution of cards you will see in a session. However, it is very easy to show that people play better when they are in a better frame of mind. If a routine, a talisman, or a ritual makes you feel more emotionally centered and confident before a session, then it will almost certainly increase your EV. Does the lucky piece of jade I got from Alaska actually bring me good luck? Probably not, but it doesn't matter, as long as I think it does.
Now, not everyone's mental game will be fooled by that. And not everyone wants conversation or interaction at the table. And some people prefer to use their hand to protect their cards. And all that is fine. Card protectors are not mandatory. But I find it odd that so many people disparage card protectors.