Quote:
Originally Posted by Quadstriker;
Third, I'm convinced based on his mannerisms that seat 7 wouldn't have asked to see that 2nd card if the ace hadn't hit the stack of reds on the way in and flipped up.
Just a thought I'm wondering about. Giiven the description of how the turned over card hit the pushed out stacks of seat 1, and the other player was in seat 7, do you think there is a chance that seat 7 saw an exposed ace, and not the other card, and assumed seat 1 had showed both cards and he was just asking what he showed rather than invoking IWTSTH? You say he asked innocently. And most players consider it an ettiquette breach to ask. You said yourself you didnt think he would have asked if one card wasnt exposed. So I wonder if he thought both were exposed and he couldnt see them clearly. Or even that he saw the one card exposed, but couldnt read it clearly, so was really just asking what the exposed card was.
Given what's at stake, do you think it's worth clarifying the situation by saying something like "the ace of diamonds was exposed" and then waiting to see if the guy still says IWTSTH?
Not saying you did anything wrong. The guy did ask. It just struck me the way your description was written that maybe the guy wasnt intentionally invoking IWTSTH. And if a dealer did suspect that, would a clarification statement be appropriate or inappropriate before turning over the second card?
Thanks
Last edited by browser2920; 11-28-2015 at 10:34 PM.