Quote:
Originally Posted by BoDiddleyMacau
Since they're all different it sounds like they were repurposed to poker from a table game. Is it an old casino that didn't always have poker or is it card club that may have bought used table game tables?
It’s just a poorly run casino that doesn’t like poker. It’s a high limit baccarat casino, other games are a mild annoyance. There’s not a dedicated poker staff, it’s part of the table games rotation. It’s sadly the same everywhere up here. Quite the shock, coming from California, the land of dedicated poker rooms and a real passion for the game and its traditions.
Quote:
Originally Posted by ReidLockhart
pfap, I think your rational side lends you to not care if it's 12 measly green chips or if it's three stacks of reds. A lot of players prefer "bigger pots" like that and it adds to their excitement and enjoyment of the game.
I do get that, and I’m happy with some reds on the table. But not every player needs $1k in reds. One rack on your initial buy-in, okay. But if you’re topping up and already have $600 in reds in front of you, any more is a waste. Frankly, it looks amateurish. The 10/25 players hardly want any greens, they prefer black or higher. The 2/5 players really hold themselves like they’re the cream of the crop (10/25 is sadly a rarity), so dress for the job you want, guys.
But it’s not really the players, it’s the house. Many players do color up racks of reds, and I always thank them. The staff selling chips just doesn’t have a concept of this. It’s the worst in the 5/5 and 5/10 PLO. 2/5 NLHE is more amusing than anything. But $3k in reds in a PLO is maddening. (I have no problem tracking the pot without stacking, it's just a waste of time and space for the players.)
Quote:
Originally Posted by psandman
No, but thats becaise the games play very differently. Players in a $1-$2 game are going to bet $200 far more often then the $2-$5 players are betting $1000. And more importantly the $1-$2 game has a lot more beginners who absolutelly can't handle o count chips ..... you know the sort... if they are going to bet $50 they are going to line up the chips individually and count them.......
Fair enough. And I think a rack or so of reds is fine. But when someone already has that much and is buying more, bring green. There’s no reason not to. And have I mentioned our tiny, tiny tables?
Quote:
Originally Posted by psandman
Last week I pushed into a $4-$8 game. I noticed the guy in the 10 seat had about a stack of red, and maybe a stack of white. I decided not to say anything, as he still had some white, might win some more and it may not be an issue.
Now THIS, I’m with ya. Grinds my gears to see reds in a white chip game. I color them up every chance I get. I figure if the player wanted to keep them, he wouldn’t bet with them.
Quote:
Originally Posted by psandman
I just couldn't believe that this guy actually thought they would write me up for calling the floor about this.
Hah! Yeah, I’ve learned not to get involved here. I’m just a lowly dealer, I have no right in telling a player what chips he can or can’t use. He knows more than I do, I need to dummy up and deal.
But every red that goes into the pot is getting instantly changed.
Quote:
Originally Posted by youtalkfunny
NL, I agree. PL, the 1/2 players are the worst about this; with the 2/5 players, you've got a chance.
And I'm with you on the chip denominations, too. While I agree with everyone who says, "but the players want mountains of smaller denominations", I disagree with WHY they want them. It's not to make the pots look bigger, it's to make their STACKS look bigger, and more intimidating.
This is true. Many of these guys are really scared little boys. We had some traveling higher stakes guys in town for a couple of weeks, and they intimidated the piss out of the regulars sitting behind mountains of red. The regs couldn’t handle the action offered, and actually drove off the new guys by being too nitty and boring. And since the visitors were slumming it and blowing off steam, they weren’t taking the game seriously and were dumping money on the table.
Quote:
Originally Posted by youtalkfunny
And every single player who saw what I was doing barked at me if I took "too many" of their useless 1k chips, and left them with puny-looking stacks.
Yeah, tourney players can get twitchy about this.
Oh, side comment about useless chips in tourneys. We don’t always have a break when the greens are no longer needed. I started using variations of this, which works VERY well:
"Okay guys, antes are 100, blinds are 400 and 800. You’re going to want to use your green chips for this. I strongly encourage you to fight that urge."
Quote:
Originally Posted by youtalkfunny
Heh, actually, his suggestion of patiently tapping the table in front of the zoned out players until they anted was one of the biggest favors anyone has ever done for me: now, instead of getting frustrated that no one is listening to me, it has helped me stopped worrying how long it takes to get the next hand out! Thanks, SuperNitFloorGuy!
Hah! There ya go. I’ve found players have gotten better about this in recent years. I usually have a few go-tos. "Everybody antes, this hand ’til the end, no exceptions." or "Let’s see who wins, the shuffling or the antes." or just sing-song "ante ante ante ante ante ante ante ante everybody ante get your ante let’s see an ante ante ante oxenfree."
Quote:
Originally Posted by youtalkfunny
When I was in NH, where the biggest bet allowed was $4 and the biggest cash game offered was $4-4 limit, they used $4 chips!
Oh for crying out loud. I remember someone telling me about a 5/10 they used to have, and I asked about the chips. Same thing. They promised it was an action game. I just smiled and nodded.